Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning

被引:310
作者
Kukkala, Aija S. [1 ]
Moilanen, Atte [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Biosci, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
conceptual basis; conservation assessment; history of conservation planning; linguistic uncertainty; spatial conservation prioritisation; terminology; RESERVE SELECTION ALGORITHMS; CAPE FLORISTIC REGION; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; PROTECTED AREAS; SCALE CONSERVATION; LAND-USE; INCORPORATING VULNERABILITY; CONSERVING BIODIVERSITY; OPPORTUNITY COSTS;
D O I
10.1111/brv.12008
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Systematic conservation planning (SCP) is a field of conservation biology concerned with delivering on-the-ground actions that achieve conservation goals. It describes a set of operational models that cover both design and implementation of conservation, with a strong focus on mobilising the collective action typically required to implement conservation. SCP, as it was originally described, was composed of six different stages: collection of data, identification of conservation goals, evaluation of the existing protected area network, design of expansions, implementation of conservation action, and long-term maintenance of biodiversity in the network. Since then, the operational model has been expanded into several different variants. Conservation actions applied inside SCP include establishment and expansion of reserve networks and allocation of habitat restoration and management. Within the broader context of SCP, there is a fundamental biogeographic-economic analysis frequently called spatial conservation prioritisation or conservation assessment, which is used for identifying where important areas for biodiversity are and how conservation goals might be achieved efficiently. Here, we review the usage and meaning of the 12 biogeographic-economic core concepts of SCP: adequacy, complementarity, comprehensiveness, effectiveness, efficiency, flexibility, irreplaceability, replacement cost, representation, representativeness, threat, and vulnerability. Some of the concepts have clear definitions whereas others may have alternative and possibly conflicting definitions. With a comprehensive literature review literature, we elucidate the historical backgrounds of these concepts, the first definitions and usages, alternative later definitions, key applications, and prior reviews. This review reduces linguistic uncertainty in the application of SCP. Since SCP is a global activity with a multitude of different stakeholders involved, it is vital that those involved can speak the same language. Through these concepts, this review serves as a source of information about the historical development of SCP. It provides a comprehensive review for anyone wishing to understand the key concepts of spatial prioritisation within SCP.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 464
页数:22
相关论文
共 220 条
[1]  
Ackery P. R., 1984, MILKWEED BUTTERLFIES
[2]   Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation? [J].
Adams, Vanessa M. ;
Pressey, Robert L. ;
Naidoo, Robin .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (02) :439-448
[3]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, NATL PARK PROT AREAS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
[6]   Would climate change drive species out of reserves?: An assessment of existing reserve-selection methods [J].
Araújo, MB ;
Cabeza, M ;
Thuiller, W ;
Hannah, L ;
Williams, PH .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2004, 10 (09) :1618-1626
[7]   The value of biodiversity in reserve selection: Representation, species weighting, and benefit functions [J].
Arponen, A ;
Heikkinen, RK ;
Thomas, CD ;
Moilanen, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :2009-2014
[8]  
Austin M. A., 1978, LAND USE S COAST NSW, V4, P169
[9]  
Austin M.P., 1986, P45
[10]  
Austin M. P., 1984, 8411 CSIRO DIV WAT R