Recruitment and retention of physicians for primary care research

被引:28
作者
Shelton, BJ
Wofford, JL
Gosselink, CA
McClatchey, MW
Brekke, K
Conry, C
Wolfe, P
Cohen, SJ
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Baptist Med Ctr, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[3] SW Missouri State Univ, Springfield, MO 65802 USA
[4] Natl Ctr Children Families & Communities, Denver, CO USA
[5] Cop Insurance Co, Practice Qual, Englewood, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[7] Colorado Fdn Med Care, Denver, CO USA
[8] Univ Arizona, Coll Publ Hlth, Endowed Chair, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
关键词
primary care research; physician recruitment; physician retention; study participation commitment;
D O I
10.1023/A:1014598332211
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The primary objective of this report is to examine factors associated with recruitment of physicians in community-based primary care research. Reported results are based on an observational study of physician recruitment efforts undertaken in a randomized controlled trial designed to improve primary care physicians' cancer screening and counseling activities. The Partners for Prevention project was a state-wide randomized controlled trial of primary care physicians selected from the state of Colorado. Two-hundred and ten eligible internal medicine and family medicine practices in both rural and urban community settings of the state of Colorado were selected into this study and a sentinel physician was chosen to represent each practice. Only 6% (13/210) of recruited practices initially declined to participate in the study, but the total refusal rate had reached 30% (59/210) by the time the intervention was implemented five months later. Study participants (n = 136) were younger (mean age 45.7 vs. 50.0, p = 0.008) and more often located in a rural area (46% vs. 31%, p = 0.04) than decliners (n = 59), but there was no association with gender of the physician (87% for females vs. 95% for males, p = 0.13). Participants were more often family practice physicians by training rather than internists (75% vs. 56%, p = 0.008), whereas there was no difference in participation rates by practice type (solo versus group, 60% vs. 64%, p = 0.52). Differences in demographic, geographic, and training characteristics between triad participants and decliners suggest the potential for better targeting of recruitment efforts. Viable strategies for recruiting community-based primary care practices to research studies are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 89
页数:11
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ADAMS PF, 1992, VIT HLTH STAT, P10
[2]  
AGRAS WS, 1982, CIRCULATION, V66, P54
[3]  
AGRAS WS, 1982, CIRCULATION, V66, P2
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1981, FUNDAMENTALS CLIN TR
[5]   Problems in recruiting community-based physicians for health services research [J].
Asch, S ;
Connor, SE ;
Hamilton, EG ;
Fox, SA .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (08) :591-599
[6]  
ATKINS CJ, 1987, AM J PREV MED, V3, P87
[7]   CLINICAL-TRIALS OF ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS PERFORMED IN THE PRIVATE-PRACTICE SETTING [J].
BERAN, RG ;
TILLEY, M .
EPILEPSIA, 1994, 35 (01) :101-106
[8]   Research in the community: Recruiting and retaining practices [J].
Carey, TS ;
Kinsinger, L ;
Keyserling, T ;
Harris, R .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1996, 21 (05) :315-327
[9]   DIFFERENCES BETWEEN RESPONDENTS AND NONRESPONDENTS IN A POPULATION-BASED CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE STUDY [J].
CRIQUI, MH ;
BARRETTCONNOR, E ;
AUSTIN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1978, 108 (05) :367-372
[10]  
DIETRICH AJ, 1990, PROG CLIN BIOL RES, V339, P373