Description and validation of a noninvasive placebo acupuncture procedure

被引:63
作者
Sherman, KJ
Hogeboom, CJ
Cherkin, DC
Deyo, RA
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] NW Inst Acupuncture & Oriental Med, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Dept Family Med & Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Dept Med & Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1089/107555302753507140
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate a simulated acupuncture technique for use in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain. Setting: The clinic of an accredited acupuncture college in Seattle, Washington. Subjects: Acupuncture-naive enrollees of Group Health Cooperative who had visited their primary care provider with a complaint of back pain that persisted for at least 3 months. Experimental design: In the first experiment, subjects received six insertions of real needles and six pokes with a toothpick in a guidetube in a two-period crossover design. In the second experiment, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either a complete treatment with real acupuncture needles or a simulated treatment using a toothpick in a guidetube. Outcomes: In the first experiment, we compared subjects' perceptions about which implement was used for each "insertion" while in the second, we compared the perceptions (e.g., acupuncturist's warmth and caring, the reasonableness of acupuncture as a treatment) and pain relief of those who received an acupuncture treatment using needles to those receiving simulated acupuncture. Results: In the first experiment, the toothpick insertions were perceived as slightly more like real needling than the real needling (mean ratings of 2.8 and 2.1, respectively; p = 0.08). In the second experiment, 52% percent of those receiving the simulated needling versus 65% of those receiving real acupuncture believed they were "definitely" or "probably" receiving real acupuncture (p = 0.33). Perceptions of acupuncture, as measured by a credibility questionnaire, were similar in the two groups. Those receiving real acupuncture were more likely to report immediate pain relief, and this was the factor most predictive of the subject's belief about which treatment they had received (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The simulated acupuncture procedure evaluated in this study represents a reasonable control treatment for acupuncture-naive individuals in randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of acupuncture for low-back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 19
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, COMPLEMENT MED RES
[2]  
BYINGTON RP, 1985, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V253, P1722
[3]  
Dale RA, 1997, ALTERN COMPLEMENT TH, V3, P200
[4]  
Deadman P., 1998, MANUAL ACUPUNCTURE
[5]   CAN TRIALS OF PHYSICAL TREATMENTS BE BLINDED - THE EXAMPLE OF TRANSCUTANEOUS ELECTRICAL NERVE-STIMULATION FOR CHRONIC PAIN [J].
DEYO, RA ;
WALSH, NE ;
SCHOENFELD, LS ;
RAMAMURTHY, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1990, 69 (01) :6-10
[6]   A review of problems in clinical acupuncture research [J].
Ernst, E ;
White, AR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (01) :3-11
[7]   Methodological and ethical issues in clinical trials of acupuncture [J].
Hammerschlag, R .
JOURNAL OF ALTERNATIVE AND COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE, 1998, 4 (02) :159-171
[8]  
HESSE J, 1994, J INTERN MED, V33, P1162
[9]  
JENSEN LB, 1979, SCAND J DENT RES, V87, P373
[10]  
JUNNILA SYT, 1982, AM J ACUPUNCTURE, V10, P259