Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation

被引:63
作者
Hicks, Diana [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Publ Policy, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Composite index; ERA; NRC ranking; RAE; Ranking; Research; RQF; University; RANKINGS;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-008-9154-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Since 1980, national university departmental ranking exercises have developed in several countries. This paper reviews exercises in the U.S., U.K. and Australia to assess the state-of-the-art and to identify common themes and trends. The findings are that the exercises are becoming more elaborate, even unwieldy, and that there is some retreat from complexity. There seems to be a movement towards bibliometric measures. The exercises also seem to be effective in enhancing university focus on research strategy.
引用
收藏
页码:393 / 404
页数:12
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, USING METRICS ALLOCA
[2]  
*AUST GOV DEP ED S, 2006, RES QUAL FRAM ASS QU
[3]  
*AUSTR BUR STAT, 2006, RES EXP DEV HIGH ED
[4]  
*AVCC, 2005, U FUND EXP
[5]   Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications - the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts [J].
Butler, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2003, 32 (01) :143-155
[6]  
*DTI, 2007, SCI ENG TECHN STAT T
[7]  
*DTI OFF SCI INN, 2007, PSA TARG METR 2006
[8]   Rankings of US economics departments [J].
Dusansky, R ;
Vernon, CJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 12 (01) :157-170
[9]   University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison [J].
Geuna, A ;
Martin, BR .
MINERVA, 2003, 41 (04) :277-304
[10]  
Gläser J, 2004, RES EVALUAT, V13, P19