Focal Electrical Stimulation as an Effective Sham Control for Active rTMS and Biofeedback Treatments

被引:11
作者
Sheffer, Christine E. [1 ,2 ]
Mennemeier, Mark S. [3 ]
Landes, Reid D. [4 ]
Dornhoffer, John [5 ]
Kimbrell, Timothy [6 ,7 ]
Bickel, Warren K. [8 ]
Brackman, Sharon [1 ]
Chelette, Kenneth C. [9 ]
Brown, Ginger [3 ]
Mai Vuong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[2] CUNY City Coll, Sophie Davis Sch Biomed Educ, New York, NY 10031 USA
[3] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Neurobiol & Dev Sci, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[4] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Biostat, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[5] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[6] Cent Arkansas Vet Healthcare Syst, Mental Hlth Serv, Little Rock, AR USA
[7] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Psychiat, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[8] Virginia Tech Caril Res Inst, Adv Recovery Res Ctr, Roanoke, VA USA
[9] Univ Kentucky, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Louisville, KY USA
关键词
Sham control techniques; TMS; rTMS; Blinded study designs; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; LONG-TERM DEPRESSION; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX; THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY; EFFICACY; TMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10484-013-9221-x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A valid sham control is important for determining the efficacy and effectiveness of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) as an experimental and clinical tool. Given the manner in which rTMS is applied, separately or in combination with self-regulatory approaches, and its intended impact on brain states, a valid sham control of this type may well serve as a meaningful control for biofeedback studies, where efforts to develop a credible control have often been less than ideal. This study examined the effectiveness of focal electrical stimulation of the frontalis muscle as a sham technique for blinding participants to high-frequency rTMS over the dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) at durations, intensities, and schedules of stimulation similar to many clinical applications. In this within-subjects single blind design, 19 participants made guesses immediately after receiving 54 counterbalanced rTMS sessions (sham, 10 Hz, 20 Hz); 7 (13 %) of the guesses were made for sham, 31 (57 %) were made for 10 Hz, and 16 (30 %) were made for 20 Hz. Participants correctly guessed the sham condition 6 % (CI 1, 32 %) of the time, which is less than the odds of chance (i.e., of guessing at random, 33 %); correctly guessed the 10 Hz condition 66 % (CI 43, 84 %) of the time, which was greater than chance; and correctly guessed the 20 Hz condition 41 % (CI 21, 65 %) of the time, which was no different than chance. Focal electrical stimulation therefore can be an effective sham control for high-frequency rTMS of the DLPFC, as well as for active biofeedback interventions. Participants were unaware that electrical stimulation was, in fact, sham rTMS.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 176
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation? [J].
Arana, Ashley B. ;
Borckardt, Jeffery J. ;
Ricci, Raffaella ;
Anderson, Berry ;
Li, Xingbao ;
Linder, Katherine J. ;
Long, James ;
Sackeim, Harold A. ;
George, Mark S. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (01) :44-51
[2]   Homosynaptic long-term depression: A mechanism for memory? [J].
Bear, MF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (17) :9457-9458
[3]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: A TMS/EEG co-registration study [J].
Bonato, C. ;
Miniussi, C. ;
Rossini, P. M. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (08) :1699-1707
[4]   Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation system [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Walker, John ;
Branham, R. Kyle ;
Rydin-Gray, Sofia ;
Hunter, Caroline ;
Beeson, Heather ;
Reeves, Scott T. ;
Madan, Alok ;
Sackeim, Harold ;
George, Mark S. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (01) :52-59
[5]   Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Chen, R ;
Classen, J ;
Gerloff, C ;
Celnik, P ;
Wassermann, EM ;
Hallett, M ;
Cohen, LG .
NEUROLOGY, 1997, 48 (05) :1398-1403
[6]   Theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex [J].
Di Lazzaro, V ;
Pilato, F ;
Saturno, E ;
Oliviero, A ;
Dileone, M ;
Mazzone, P ;
Insola, A ;
Tonali, PA ;
Ranieri, F ;
Huang, YZ ;
Rothwell, JC .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2005, 565 (03) :945-950
[7]   A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition [J].
Fitzgerald, Paul B. ;
Fountain, Sarah ;
Daskalakis, Zafiris J. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (12) :2584-2596
[8]   Controversy: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation shows efficacy in treating psychiatric diseases (depression, mania, schizophrenia, obsessive-complusive disorder, panic, posttraumatic stress disorder) [J].
George, Mark S. ;
Padberg, Frank ;
Schlaepfer, Thomas E. ;
O'Reardon, John P. ;
Fitzgerald, Paul B. ;
Nahas, Ziad H. ;
Marcolin, Marco A. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2009, 2 (01) :14-21
[9]   Mechanisms and state of the art of transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
George, MS ;
Nahas, Z ;
Kozel, FA ;
Li, XB ;
Denslow, S ;
Yamanaka, K ;
Mishory, A ;
Foust, MJ ;
Bohning, DE .
JOURNAL OF ECT, 2002, 18 (04) :170-181
[10]   Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain [J].
Hallett, M .
NATURE, 2000, 406 (6792) :147-150