Effects of acetabular component orientation on dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty

被引:77
作者
Nadzadi, ME
Pedersen, DR
Callaghan, JJ
Brown, TD
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Dept Biomed Engn, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
关键词
hip; total hip; dislocation; finite element; range of motion; stability;
D O I
10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00096-1
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
Objective. Examine the role of surgical orientation of the acetabular cup on posterior dislocation propensity for small-head-size total hip arthroplasty. Design. A finite element model of a widely used total hip arthroplasty system was examined for peak resisting moment and range-of-motion prior to impingement, as well as prior to onset of posterior dislocation. Acetabular Component Surgical orientation was varied. Background. Dislocation is a leading cause of total hip replacement failure. with in incidence between 2% and 11%. Clinical registries imply acetabular component orientation to be a leading predictor dislocation. The finite element method permits this complex kinetic behavior to be addressed systematically. Methods. Twenty-five combinations of cup abduction (five angles) and anteversion (five angles) were Studied, with the resultant resisting moment about the CLIP center being tracked in each case. Key events were benchmarked. and a novel dislocation resistance index was developed for multi-factor comparison. Results. Increasing tilt and/or anteversion resulted in a monotonically increasing range-of-motion prior to impingement, as well as increased peak resisting moment. Range of motion was more sensitive to tilt, while peak resisting, moment was more sensitive to anteversion. Peak resisting moment for 22-min head size was nearly 25%.less than that for a 26-mm head. Conclusions. Increased cup tilt and anteversion discourage posterior dislocations of-small-head-size components.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 40
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
AMSTUTZ HC, 1975, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V111, P124
[2]
Brand R A, 1994, J Arthroplasty, V9, P45, DOI 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90136-8
[3]
A MODEL OF LOWER-EXTREMITY MUSCULAR ANATOMY [J].
BRAND, RA ;
CROWNINSHIELD, RD ;
WITTSTOCK, CE ;
PEDERSEN, DR ;
CLARK, CR ;
VANKRIEKEN, FM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1982, 104 (04) :304-310
[4]
CALLAGHAN JJ, 2001, IN PRESS CLIN ORTHOP
[5]
CALLAGHAN JJ, 1995, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V317, P14
[6]
COBALT(II) AND NICKEL(II) COMPLEXES OF SOME NITROGEN-OXYGEN AND NITROGEN-SULFUR LIGANDS [J].
CHANDRA, S ;
SHARMA, KK .
TRANSITION METAL CHEMISTRY, 1984, 9 (01) :1-3
[7]
CHAO EYS, 1979, EXTERNAL FIXATION CU, P345
[8]
CHARNLEY J, 1969, RECONS SURG, V11, P9
[9]
Charnley J, 1973, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V95, P9
[10]
The elevated-rim acetabular liner in total hip arthroplasty: Relationship to postoperative dislocation [J].
Cobb, TK ;
Morrey, BF ;
Ilstrup, DM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 78A (01) :80-86