Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables

被引:581
作者
Keele, L
Kelly, NJ
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Polit Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/pan/mpj006
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
A lagged dependent variable in an OLS regression is often used as a means of capturing dynamic effects in political processes and as a method for ridding the model of autocorrelation. But recent work contends that the lagged dependent variable specification is too problematic for use in most situations. More specifically, if residual autocorrelation is present, the lagged dependent variable causes the coefficients for explanatory variables to be biased downward. We use a Monte Carlo analysis to assess empirically how much bias is present when a lagged dependent variable is used under a wide variety of circumstances. In our analysis, we compare the performance of the lagged dependent variable model to several other time series models. We show that while the lagged dependent variable is inappropriate in some circumstances, it remains an appropriate model for the dynamic theories often tested by applied analysts. From the analysis, we develop several practical suggestions on when and how to use lagged dependent variables on the right-hand side of a model.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 205
页数:20
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], POLITICAL ANAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ANN M POL METH LOS A
[3]  
BECK N, 1985, POLITICAL METHODOLOG, V11, P71
[4]  
Davidson Russell., 1993, Estimation and Inference in Econometrics
[5]  
Greene WilliamH., 2003, Economic Analysis
[6]   A NOTE ON SERIAL-CORRELATION BIAS IN ESTIMATES OF DISTRIBUTED LAGS [J].
GRILICHES, Z .
ECONOMETRICA, 1961, 29 (01) :65-73
[7]  
Hendry D.F., 1995, Dynamic Econometrics
[8]   SERIAL-CORRELATION AS A CONVENIENT SIMPLIFICATION, NOT A NUISANCE - COMMENT ON A STUDY OF DEMAND FOR MONEY BY BANK OF ENGLAND [J].
HENDRY, DF ;
MIZON, GE .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1978, 88 (351) :549-563
[9]  
HIBBS DA, 1974, SOCIOL METHODOL, P252
[10]  
HURWICZ L, 1950, STAT INFERENCE DYNAM, P215