A hybrid source apportionment model integrating measured data and air quality model results

被引:14
作者
Schichtel, BA [1 ]
Malm, WC
Gebhart, KA
Barna, MG
Knipping, EM
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Cooperat Inst Res Atmosphere, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Natl Pk Serv, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005JD006238
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] The Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility (BRAVO) study was an intensive air quality study designed to understand the causes of haze in Big Bend National Park. Daily speciated fine aerosols were measured from July through October 1999 at 37 sites located mostly in Texas. In support of BRAVO, two chemical transport models (CTMs) were used to apportion particulate sulfate at Big Bend and other sites in Texas to sources in the eastern and western United States, Texas, Mexico, and the Carbon I and II coal-fired power plants, located 225 km southeast of Big Bend in Mexico. Analysis of the CTM source attribution results and comparison to results from receptor models revealed systematic biases. To reduce the multiplicative biases, a hybrid source apportionment model, based on inverse modeling, was developed that adjusted the initial CTM source contributions so the modeled sulfate concentrations optimally fit the measured data, resulting in refined daily source contributions. The method was tested using synthetic data and successfully reduced source attribution biases. The refined sulfate source attribution results reduced the initial eastern U. S. contribution to Big Bend, averaged over the BRAVO study period, from similar to 40% to similar to 30%, while Mexico's contribution increased from 24 - 32% to similar to 40%. The contribution from the Carbon facility increased from similar to 14% to over 20%. Contributions from Texas and the western United States changed little, with final contributions of similar to 16% and 5 - 9%, respectively. The increase in Mexico's contribution is consistent with more recent SO2 emissions estimates that indicate that the BRAVO Mexican SO2 emissions were underestimated. Source attribution results for other monitoring sites in west Texas were similar to results at Big Bend. In eastern Texas, the eastern United States accounted for up to 70% of the measured sulfate, with Texas contributing similar to 20 - 30%.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Comparison of sulfate and nitrate particle mass concentrations measured by IMPROVE and the CDN [J].
Ames, RB ;
Malm, WC .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (05) :905-916
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 3 COL STAT U COOP I
[3]  
[Anonymous], BIG BEND REGIONAL AE
[4]  
BARNA MG, 2006, IN PRESS ATMOS ENV
[5]   Measurements of rural sulfur dioxide and particle sulfate: Analysis of CASTNet data, 1987 through 1996 [J].
Baumgardner, RE ;
Isil, SS ;
Bowser, JJ ;
Fitzgerald, KM .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 1999, 49 (11) :1266-1279
[6]  
Belsley DA, 1980, Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
[7]   Inverse modelling of national and European CH4 emissions using the atmospheric zoom model TM5 [J].
Bergamaschi, P ;
Krol, M ;
Dentener, F ;
Vermeulen, A ;
Meinhardt, F ;
Graul, R ;
Ramonet, M ;
Peters, W ;
Dlugokencky, EJ .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2005, 5 :2431-2460
[8]  
Boggs PT., 1990, CONT MATH, V112, P183, DOI DOI 10.1090/CONM/112/1087109
[9]   Mass balance inverse modelling of methane in the 1990s using a Chemistry Transport Model [J].
Butler, TM ;
Simmonds, I ;
Rayner, PJ .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2004, 4 :2561-2580
[10]   A 3-DIMENSIONAL EULERIAN ACID DEPOSITION MODEL - PHYSICAL CONCEPTS AND FORMULATION [J].
CHANG, JS ;
BROST, RA ;
ISAKSEN, ISA ;
MADRONICH, S ;
MIDDLETON, P ;
STOCKWELL, WR ;
WALCEK, CJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1987, 92 (D12) :14681-14700