Bone mineral density of opposing hips using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in single-beam and fan-beam design

被引:33
作者
Franck, H [1 ]
Munz, M [1 ]
Scherrer, M [1 ]
机构
[1] CLIN MAYENBAD,D-88339 BAD WALDSEE,GERMANY
关键词
bone densitometry; bilateral hip; femur; DXA; single beam; fan beam;
D O I
10.1007/s002239900365
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Bone densitometry focuses on bone mineral area density (BMD in g/cm(2)) of the proximal femur and spine in anterior-posterior (AP) projections. Artifacts, such as osteoarthritis and osteophytic calcifications (OC) influence spine BMD, especially in AP scans. If only two sites are measured, as is usual in clinical practice, there may be advantages to measuring both femora rather than one femur and the spine. This would not be useful, however, if there was strong symmetry between the two sides. Furthermore, fan beam (FB) techniques have become available for measuring BMD with less data acquisition time. We compared densitometry of opposing femora in 421 patients (369 women, mean age 59.0 +/- 4.8; 52 men, mean age 56.9 +/- 7.4) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA): both single-. beam (SB) and FB modes were evaluated. The precision errors in vivo (short-and midterm) of total BMD were 0.7% for both SB and FB. The total BMD and BMC of the left hip (0.817 +/- 0.124 g/cm(2), 31.3 +/- 6.4 g) were significantly (P < 0.001) higher (2-3%) than the corresponding values of the right hip (0.801 +/- 0.125 g/cm(2), 30.3 +/- 6.3 g) in both SB and FB (left BMD 0.802 +/- 0.117 g/cm(2) BMC 30.0 +/- 6.2 g ,BMC 29.3 +/- 6.3 g) modes. However, BMD of the femoral neck and Ward's triangle were not significantly (P > 0.05) different between the two sides. The FB results were generally 2% lower than SB results. There were highly significant (P < 0.001) correlations (r > 0.9) between both hips using both SB and FB. For diagnostic procedures and longitudinal studies, one should consider that there are bilateral differences of femur BMD, as well as differences between FB and SB scan modes.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 447
页数:3
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN BOTH HIPS [J].
BALSEIRO, J ;
FAHEY, FH ;
ZIESSMAN, HA .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (01) :151-153
[2]  
BELMONTESERRANO MA, 1993, J RHEUMATOL, V20, P1005
[3]   DUAL X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY - A COMPARISON BETWEEN FAN-BEAM AND PENCIL BEAM SCANS [J].
BLAKE, GM ;
PARKER, JC ;
BUXTON, FMA ;
FOGELMAN, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1993, 66 (790) :902-906
[4]   BONE-DENSITY AT VARIOUS SITES FOR PREDICTION OF HIP-FRACTURES [J].
CUMMINGS, SR ;
BLACK, DM ;
NEVITT, MC ;
BROWNER, W ;
CAULEY, J ;
ENSRUD, K ;
GENANT, HK ;
PALERMO, L ;
SCOTT, J ;
VOGT, TM .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8837) :72-75
[5]   BILATERAL COMPARISON OF FEMORAL BONE-DENSITY AND HIP AXIS LENGTH FROM SINGLE AND FAN-BEAM DXA SCANS [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
GENANT, HK ;
MCCLUNG, M .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 56 (01) :26-31
[6]   CROSS-CALIBRATION OF DXA EQUIPMENT - UPGRADING FROM A HOLOGIC QDR 1000/W TO A QDR-2000 [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
GLUER, CC ;
ESTILO, M ;
GENANT, HK .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 52 (02) :79-84
[7]   EVALUATION OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY BONE-MINERAL MEASUREMENT COMPARISON OF A SINGLE-BEAM AND FAN-BEAM DESIGN - THE EFFECT OF OSTEOPHYTIC CALCIFICATION ON SPINE BONE-MINERAL DENSITY [J].
FRANCK, H ;
MUNZ, M ;
SCHERRER, M .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 56 (03) :192-195
[8]   Classification of osteoporosis in the elderly is dependent on site-specific analysis [J].
Greenspan, SL ;
MaitlandRamsey, L ;
Myers, E .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 58 (06) :409-414
[9]  
HALL ML, 1991, EUR J NUCL MED, V18, P38
[10]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OSTEOARTHRITIS AND OSTEOPOROSIS IN THE GENERAL-POPULATION - THE CHINGFORD STUDY [J].
HART, DJ ;
MOOTOOSAMY, I ;
DOYLE, DV ;
SPECTOR, TD .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1994, 53 (03) :158-162