Two-year clinical trial of oral alendronate versus intravenous pamidronate in children with osteogenesis imperfecta

Introduction: Bisphosphonate therapies increase BMD and may reduce fractures in children with osteogenesis imperfecta (OI). A study directly comparing oral with intravenous bisphosphonate has not been published. This clinical trial compares oral alendronate with intravenous pamidronate in children with 01 using an open-label, prospective, 2-year, randomized design. Materials and Methods: Children over the age of 3 years were stratified by bone age, pubertal stage, and type of 01 and then randomized to receive oral alendronate 1 mg/kg/day in tablet form or intravenous pamidronate, 3 mg/kg/4 months. One child was assigned to pamidronate. One child randomized to intravenous pamidronate changed to oral alendronate. Eighteen children completed 12 months of therapy: nine on oral alendronate and nine on intravenous pamidronate. Primary outcome efficacy was increase in BMD. Secondary outcomes included changes in bone turnover biomarkers, fracture incidence, and growth. Results: Total body and lumbar spine BMD increased, turnover markers decreased, and linear growth increased equivalently with oral and intravenous therapy. Fracture incidence showed a trend to decrease in both groups, with a significant decrease in fracture rates when the oral and intravenous groups were pooled. There were greater responses in BMD and growth in children with milder OI (type I) than those with more severe disease (types III and IV), but there were no significant effects of age or pubertal stage. Conclusions: Oral and intravenous bisphosphonate therapies are equally effective in children with OI and are particularly effective in milder forms. The oral route is highly acceptable in children and has practical advantages over the intravenous route.