Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer

被引:533
作者
Chan, S
Friedrichs, K
Noel, D
Pintér, T
Van Belle, S
Vorobiof, D
Duarte, R
Gil, MG
Bodrogi, I
Murray, E
Yelle, L
von Minckwitz, G
Korec, S
Simmonds, P
Buzzi, F
Mancha, RG
Richardson, G
Walpole, E
Ronzoni, M
Murawsky, M
Alakl, M
Riva, A
Crown, J
机构
[1] City Hosp, Dept Clin Oncol, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[2] Royal S Hants Hosp, CRC, Wessex Reg Med Oncol Unit, Southampton SO9 4PE, Hants, England
[3] Univ Hamburg, Krankenhaus Eppendorf, Frauenklin & Poliklin, D-2000 Hamburg, Germany
[4] Univ Frankfurt Klinikum, Klin Gynakol & Onkol, D-6000 Frankfurt, Germany
[5] Hop Sacre Coeur, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ H4J 1C5, Canada
[6] Hop Notre Dame de Bon Secours, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ H2L 4K8, Canada
[7] Country Hosp, Oncoradiol Dept, Gyor, Hungary
[8] Natl Inst Oncol, Budapest, Hungary
[9] Univ Ziekenhuis Gent, Dienst Med Oncol, Ghent, Belgium
[10] Sandton Oncol Ctr, Johannesburg, South Africa
[11] Groote Schuur Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[12] Natl Inst Cancerol, Bogota, Colombia
[13] Inst Catalan Oncol, Serv Oncol, Barcelona, Spain
[14] Hosp Prov, Serv Oncol, Cordoba, Spain
[15] Natl Canc Inst, Bratislava, Slovakia
[16] Osped Civile S Maria, Serv Oncol, Terni, Italy
[17] Univ Milan, Osped San Raffaele, Unita Radiochemioterapia, I-20127 Milan, Italy
[18] Monash Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol & Clin Haematol, Clayton, Vic 3168, Australia
[19] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia
[20] Rhone Poulenc Rorer, Antony, France
[21] St Vincent Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2341
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent-containing chemotherapy, Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. Results: A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P = .008), Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks: difference not. significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. Conclusion: The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:2341 / 2354
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY
    AARONSON, NK
    AHMEDZAI, S
    BERGMAN, B
    BULLINGER, M
    CULL, A
    DUEZ, NJ
    FILIBERTI, A
    FLECHTNER, H
    FLEISHMAN, SB
    DEHAES, JCJM
    KAASA, S
    KLEE, M
    OSOBA, D
    RAZAVI, D
    ROFE, PB
    SCHRAUB, S
    SNEEUW, K
    SULLIVAN, M
    TAKEDA, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) : 365 - 376
  • [2] Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
  • [3] A COMPARISON OF 2 DOSES OF ADRIAMYCIN IN THE PRIMARY CHEMOTHERAPY OF DISSEMINATED BREAST-CARCINOMA
    CARMOPEREIRA, J
    COSTA, FO
    HENRIQUES, E
    GODINHO, F
    CANTINHOLOPES, MG
    SALESLUIS, A
    RUBENS, RD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 56 (04) : 471 - 473
  • [4] IMPROVING THE QUALITY-OF-LIFE DURING CHEMOTHERAPY FOR ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A COMPARISON OF INTERMITTENT AND CONTINUOUS TREATMENT STRATEGIES
    COATES, A
    GEBSKI, V
    BISHOP, JF
    JEAL, PN
    WOODS, RL
    SNYDER, R
    TATTERSALL, MHN
    BYRNE, M
    HARVEY, V
    GILL, G
    SIMPSON, J
    DRUMMOND, R
    BROWNE, J
    VANCOOTEN, R
    FORBES, JF
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1987, 317 (24) : 1490 - 1495
  • [5] Collett D., 1994, Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research
  • [6] CONTINUOUS CHEMOTHERAPY IN RESPONSIVE METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - A ROLE FOR TUMOR-MARKERS
    DIXON, AR
    JACKSON, L
    CHAN, SY
    BADLEY, RA
    BLAMEY, RW
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 68 (01) : 181 - 185
  • [7] Fumoleau P, 1997, Expert Opin Investig Drugs, V6, P1853, DOI 10.1517/13543784.6.12.1853
  • [8] GAMUCCI T, 1998, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V17, pA111
  • [9] RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL COMPARING MITOXANTRONE WITH DOXORUBICIN IN PREVIOUSLY TREATED PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER
    HENDERSON, IC
    ALLEGRA, JC
    WOODCOCK, T
    WOLFF, S
    BRYAN, S
    CARTWRIGHT, K
    DUKART, G
    HENRY, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (05) : 560 - 571
  • [10] ADRIAMYCIN CARDIOTOXICITY
    HENDERSON, IC
    FREI, E
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1980, 99 (05) : 671 - 674