Hormone replacement therapy and false positive recall in the Million Women Study: patterns of use, hormonal constituents and consistency of effect

被引:26
作者
Banks, E [1 ]
Reeves, G
Beral, V
Bull, D
Crossley, B
Simmonds, M
Hilton, E
Bailey, S
Barrett, N
Briers, P
English, R
Jackson, A
Kutt, E
Lavelle, J
Rockall, L
Wallis, MG
Wilson, M
Patnick, J
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Natl Ctr Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Univ Oxford, Canc Res UK Epidemiol Unit, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[3] Princess Wales Community Hosp, Breast Screening Serv, Bromsgrove B61 0BB, England
[4] Charing Cross Hosp, W London Breast Screening Serv, London W6 8RF, England
[5] Gloucestershire Breast Screening Serv, Cheltenham GL53 7AS, Glos, England
[6] Churchill Hosp, Oxford Radcliffe Hosp NHS Trust, Breast Care Unit, Oxford OX3 7JH, England
[7] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Patricia Massey Breast Screening Unit, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
[8] Avon Breast Screening, Cent Hlth Clin, Bristol BS2 0JD, Avon, England
[9] Royal Lancaster Infirm, N Lancashire Breast Screening Serv, Lancaster LA1 4GG, England
[10] Worthing Dist Hosp, W Sussex Breast Screening Serv, Worthing BN11 2DH, W Sussex, England
[11] Coventry & Warwick Hosp, Breast Screenign Unit, Coventry CV1 4FH, W Midlands, England
[12] Withington Hosp, Nightingale Ctr, Greater Manchester Breast Screening Serv, Manchester M20 0PT, Lancs, England
[13] Natl Hlth Serv Ctr Screening Programmes, Sheffield S10 3TH, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1186/bcr1364
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction Current and recent users of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have an increased risk of being recalled to assessment at mammography without breast cancer being diagnosed ('false positive recall'), but there is limited information on the effects of different patterns of HRT use on this. The aim of this study is to investigate in detail the relationship between patterns of use of HRT and false positive recall. Methods A total of 87,967 postmenopausal women aged 50 to 64 years attending routine breast cancer screening at 10 UK National Health Service Breast Screening Units from 1996 to 1998 joined the Million Women Study by completing a questionnaire before screening and were followed for their screening outcome. Results Overall, 399 (0.5%) participants were diagnosed with breast cancer and 2,629 (3.0%) had false positive recall. Compared to never users of HRT, the adjusted relative risk (95% CI) of false positive recall was: 1.62 (1.43 - 1.83), 1.80 1.62 - 2.01) and 0.76 (0.52 - 1.10) in current users of oestrogen-only HRT, oestrogen-progestagen HRT and tibolone, respectively ( p ( heterogeneity) < 0.0001); 1.65 (1.43 - 1.91), 1.49 (1.22 - 1.81) and 2.11 (1.45 - 3.07) for current HRT used orally, transdermally or via an implant, respectively ( p ( heterogeneity) = 0.2); and 1.84 (1.67 - 2.04) and 1.75 ( 1.49 - 2.06) for sequential and continuous oestrogen-progestagen HRT, respectively ( p ( heterogeneity) = 0.6). The relative risk of false positive recall among current users appeared to increase with increasing time since menopause, but did not vary significantly according to any other factors examined, including duration of use, hormonal constituents, dose, whether single- or two-view screening was used, or the woman's personal characteristics. Conclusion Current use of oestrogen-only and oestrogen-progestagen HRT, but not tibolone, increases the risk of false positive recall at screening.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Effects of conjugated, equine estrogen in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy - The women's health initiative randomized controlled trial [J].
Anderson, GL ;
Limacher, M ;
Assaf, AR ;
Bassford, T ;
Beresford, SAA ;
Black, H ;
Bonds, D ;
Brunner, R ;
Brzyski, R ;
Caan, B ;
Chlebowski, R ;
Curb, D ;
Gass, M ;
Hays, J ;
Heiss, G ;
Hendrix, S ;
Howard, BV ;
Hsia, J ;
Hubbell, A ;
Jackson, R ;
Johnson, KC ;
Judd, H ;
Kotchen, JM ;
Kuller, L ;
LaCroix, AZ ;
Lane, D ;
Langer, RD ;
Lasser, N ;
Lewis, CE ;
Manson, J ;
Margolis, K ;
Ockene, J ;
O'Sullivan, MJ ;
Phillips, L ;
Prentice, RL ;
Ritenbaugh, C ;
Robbins, J ;
Rossouw, JE ;
Sarto, G ;
Stefanick, ML ;
Van Horn, L ;
Wactawski-Wende, J ;
Wallace, R ;
Wassertheil-Smoller, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (14) :1701-1712
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, BREAST CANCER RES, V1, P73, DOI DOI 10.1186/BCR16
[3]   Influence of personal characteristics of individual women on sensitivity and specificity of mammography in the Million Women Study: cohort study [J].
Banks, E ;
Reeves, G ;
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Crossley, B ;
Simmonds, M ;
Hilton, E ;
Bailey, S ;
Barrett, N ;
Briers, P ;
English, R ;
Jackson, A ;
Kutt, E ;
Lavelle, J ;
Rockall, L ;
Wallis, MG ;
Wilson, M ;
Patnick, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7464) :477-479
[4]   Impact of use of hormone replacement therapy on false positive recall in the NHS breast screening programme: results from the million women study [J].
Banks, E ;
Reeves, G ;
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Crossley, B ;
Simmonds, M ;
Hilton, E ;
Bailey, S ;
Barren, N ;
Briers, P ;
English, R ;
Jackson, A ;
Kutt, E ;
Lavelle, J ;
Rockall, L ;
Wallis, MG ;
Wilson, M ;
Patnick, J .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 328 (7451) :1291-1292
[5]   Predictors of outcome of mammography in the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme [J].
Banks, E ;
Reeves, G ;
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Crossley, B ;
Simmonds, M ;
Hilton, E ;
Bailey, S ;
Barrett, N ;
Briers, P ;
English, R ;
Jackson, A ;
Kutt, E ;
Lavelle, J ;
Rockall, L ;
Wallis, MG ;
Wilson, M .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2002, 9 (02) :74-82
[6]  
Banks E, 2001, J Epidemiol Biostat, V6, P357
[7]   Hormone replacement therapy and the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening: a review [J].
Banks, E .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2001, 8 (01) :29-35
[8]  
Beral V, 2004, MENOPAUSE HORMONE RE, P136
[9]  
Beral Valerie, 2003, Lancet, V362, P419, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14065-2
[10]  
*BRIT MED ASS ROYA, 1999, BRIT NAT FORM