Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions

被引:4301
作者
VanRaden, P. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Anim Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
genomic selection; mixed model; computer program; relationship matrix;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2007-0980
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Efficient methods for processing genomic data were developed to increase reliability of estimated breeding values and to estimate thousands of marker effects simultaneously. Algorithms were derived and computer programs tested with simulated data for 2,967 bulls and 50,000 markers distributed randomly across 30 chromosomes. Estimation of genomic inbreeding coefficients required accurate estimates of allele frequencies in the base population. Linear model predictions of breeding values were computed by 3 equivalent methods: 1) iteration for individual allele effects followed by summation across loci to obtain estimated breeding values, 2) selection index including a genomic relationship matrix, and 3) mixed model equations including the inverse of genomic relationships. A blend of first- and second-order Jacobi iteration using 2 separate relaxation factors converged well for allele frequencies and effects. Reliability of predicted net merit for young bulls was 63% compared with 32% using the traditional relationship matrix. Nonlinear predictions were also computed using iteration on data and nonlinear regression on marker deviations; an additional (about 3%) gain in reliability for young bulls increased average reliability to 66%. Computing times increased linearly with number of genotypes. Estimation of allele frequencies required 2 processor days, and genomic predictions required < 1 d per trait, and traits were processed in parallel. Information from genotyping was equivalent to about 20 daughters with phenotypic records. Actual gains may differ because the simulation did not account for linkage disequilibrium in the base population or selection in subsequent generations.
引用
收藏
页码:4414 / 4423
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   A Genomic Background Based Method for Association Analysis in Related Individuals [J].
Amin, Najaf ;
van Duijn, Cornelia M. ;
Aulchenko, Yurii S. .
PLOS ONE, 2007, 2 (12)
[2]   Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes [J].
Calus, M. P. L. ;
Meuwissen, T. H. E. ;
de Roos, A. P. W. ;
Veerkamp, R. F. .
GENETICS, 2008, 178 (01) :553-561
[3]   Breeding value estimation for fat percentage using dense markers on Bos taurus autosome 14 [J].
de Roos, A. P. W. ;
Schrooten, C. ;
Mullaart, E. ;
Calus, M. P. L. ;
Veerkamp, R. F. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2007, 90 (10) :4821-4829
[4]  
Garrick DJ, 2007, J DAIRY SCI, V90, P376
[5]   A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose Belgian Blue cattle [J].
Gengler, N. ;
Mayeres, P. ;
Szydlowski, M. .
ANIMAL, 2007, 1 (01) :21-28
[6]   Estimation by simulation of the efficiency of the French marker-assisted selection program in dairy cattle [J].
Guillaume, Francois ;
Fritz, Sebastien ;
Boichard, Didier ;
Druet, Tom .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2008, 40 (01) :91-102
[7]  
Henderson C.R., 1963, Selection index and expected genetic advance
[8]  
JANSS L, 1999, INTERBULL B, V20, P62
[9]   An efficient variance component approach implementing an average information REML suitable for combined LD and linkage mapping with a general complex pedigree [J].
Lee, SH ;
van der Werf, JHJ .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2006, 38 (01) :25-43
[10]   Technical note:: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection [J].
Legarra, A. ;
Misztal, I. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2008, 91 (01) :360-366