Long-term treatment with probiotics in primary care patients with irritable bowel syndrome - a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled trial
被引:63
作者:
Begtrup, Luise Molenberg
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, Denmark
Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Med Gastroenterol, Odense, DenmarkUniv Southern Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, Denmark
Begtrup, Luise Molenberg
[1
,2
]
de Muckadell, Ove B. Schaffalitzky
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Med Gastroenterol, Odense, DenmarkUniv Southern Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, Denmark
de Muckadell, Ove B. Schaffalitzky
[2
]
论文数: 引用数:
h-index:
机构:
Kjeldsen, Jens
[2
]
Christensen, Rene dePont
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, DenmarkUniv Southern Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, Denmark
Christensen, Rene dePont
[1
]
Jarbol, Dorte Ejg
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, DenmarkUniv Southern Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, Denmark
Jarbol, Dorte Ejg
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Inst Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, Denmark
Objective. Meta-analyses have indicated effect of probiotics on irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, few long-term trials have been conducted and uncertainty remains as to effectiveness and long-term effect in a primary care setting. We aimed to investigate the effect of probiotics compared with placebo in the management of IBS in primary care during a 6-month treatment period and with a 6-month follow-up. Material and methods. We randomized IBS patients fulfilling Rome III criteria to receive two capsules twice daily either containing placebo or a probiotic mixture of Lactobacillus paracasei ssp paracasei F19, Lactobacillus acidophilus L alpha 5 and Bifidobacterium Bb12 in an amount of 1.3 x 10(10) CFU per capsule. Primary endpoint was proportion of responders defined as patients reporting adequate relief (AR) at least 50% of the time in the 6-month treatment period. Secondary outcomes were proportions of patients reporting AR at different time points, and change in gastrointestinal symptoms and health-related quality of life (HrQOL) from baseline to 6 and 12 months. Results. A total of 131 patients were included in this study. The proportion of responders in the treatment period was 52% (35/67) in the probiotic group versus 41% (26/64) in the placebo group, p = 0.18. Overall we found no difference between the groups in change in gastrointestinal symptoms after treatment. Patients improved in HrQOL, but with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Conclusion. During a 6-month treatment period, we were not able to detect a positive effect of probiotic when compared with placebo.