Open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, randomized study of cefprozil versus erythromycin in children with group A streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis

被引:3
作者
Brook, I
Aronovitz, GH
Pichichero, ME
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus; pharyngitis/tonsillitis; cefprozil; erythromycin;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(00)89084-0
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Cefprozil and erythromycin are acceptable alternatives to penicillin in the treatment of pharyngitis/tonsillitis due to group A beta-hemolytic streptococcus (GABHS). Objective: The purpose of this trial was to determine the relative efficacy and tolerability of cefprozil and erythromycin in the treatment of pediatric pharyngitis/tonsillitis due to GABHS. Methods: This trial compared the bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of erythromycin and cefprozil in children 2 to 12 years of age with culture-documented GABHS pharyngitis/ tonsillitis. Children who were allergic to penicillin, cefprozil, or erythromycin were excluded. Patients were prospectively randomly assigned to receive 10 days of oral therapy with either cefprozil suspension 15 mg/kg per day in 2 divided doses or erythromycin ethylsuccinate suspension 30 mg/kg per day in 3 divided doses. Primary efficacy end points were bacteriologic and clinical response 2 to 8 days after treatment ended. The frequency and severity of adverse events and their relationship to treatment were also assessed. Results: A total of 199 patients were enrolled and treated (cefprozil, 99; erythromycin, 100); 12 patients in the cefprozil group and 15 in the erythromycin group were not evaluable. The GABHS eradication rate was significantly higher with cefprozil (95%) than with erythromycin (74%) (P = 0.001). The posttreatment carrier rate was lower in the cefprozil group (5%) than in the erythromycin group (18%) (95% CI, -22.3 to -3.8). Clinical cure rate was 90% (78/87) with cefprozil and 91% (77/85) with erythromycin (P = 0.95) (treatment group difference, -0.93; 95% CI, -9.9% to 8.0%). The overall incidence of drug-related adverse events was not significantly different in the 2 groups (11% with cefprozil, 18% with erythromycin). The most common adverse events were diarrhea and vomiting. Two patients in the erythromycin group discontinued therapy because of adverse events. Conclusions: The bacteriologic eradication rate was significantly greater with cefprozil compared with erythromycin in children with pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Both cefprozil and erythromycin produced a clinical cure in > 90% of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1889 / 1900
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   CHEMISTRY OF NEW ANTIBIOTICS [J].
ABRAHAM, EP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1965, 39 (05) :692-+
[2]   CROSS-SENSITIVITY TO CEPHALOSPORINS IN PATIENTS ALLERGIC TO PENICILLIN [J].
ANDERSON, JA .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1986, 5 (05) :557-561
[3]  
ANNE S, 1995, ANN ALLERG ASTHMA IM, V74, P167
[4]   Treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections: clinical trials with cefprozil [J].
Aronovitz, G .
PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1998, 17 (08) :S83-S88
[5]  
ASSEM ESK, 1974, IMMUNOLOGY, V27, P255
[6]   REVIEW OF IN-VITRO ACTIVITY, PHARMACOKINETIC CHARACTERISTICS, SAFETY, AND CLINICAL EFFICACY OF CEFPROZIL, A NEW ORAL CEPHALOSPORIN [J].
BARRIERE, SL .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1993, 27 (09) :1082-1089
[7]   Diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: A practice guideline [J].
Bisno, AL ;
Gerber, MA ;
Gwaltney, JM ;
Kaplan, EL ;
Schwartz, RH .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 25 (03) :574-583
[8]   The role of β-lactamase producing bacteria and bacterial interference in streptococcal tonsillitis [J].
Brook, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2001, 17 (06) :439-442
[9]   Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in clinical isolates of group A streptococci from Ontario, Canada [J].
De Azavedo, JCS ;
Yeung, RH ;
Bast, DJ ;
Duncan, CL ;
Borgia, SB ;
Low, DE .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1999, 43 (09) :2144-2147
[10]  
Dowell SF, 1998, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V58, P1335