Prostate cancer on the Internet - Information or misinformation?

被引:54
作者
Black, PC
Penson, DF
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Urol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Kenneth Norris Jr Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; Internet;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00996-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We assessed the quality of information available to patients on prostate cancer on the Internet. Materials and Methods: The search engine Webcrawler (R) was used with the search term "prostate cancer" to generate a list of 75 websites which were reviewed for currency, disclosure, attribution, interactivity and content. A rating tool was designed including 50 elements considered essential for a comprehensive review of prostate cancer, and each website was judged for degree of coverage and accuracy (each rated on a scale of 1 to 3) of information for each element. Results: Of the 75 sites 39 contained information about prostate cancer. Only 9 sites indicated a date of last update within 6 months. References were rarely given (in 5) and a disclaimer was provided on less than half of the sites (18). The sites covered a mean of 24 elements (range 6 to 43) with a mean coverage rating of 1.0 to 2.6 (1.8 overall). Of 943 elements covered on 39 sites, 94% were completely correct, 5% were mostly correct and 1% was mostly incorrect. Conclusions: The information on the Internet is of sufficient quality to aid in patient decision making. However, there are numerous shortcomings especially related to currency, disclosure and attribution. Degree of coverage is highly variable and there is a deficiency in balance of evidence found on many sites. The urologist needs to be aware of such shortcomings when counseling patients on prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1836 / 1842
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Al-Bahrani A, 2004, Colorectal Dis, V6, P323, DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2004.00604.x
[2]   Health information on the Internet -: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish [J].
Berland, GK ;
Elliott, MN ;
Morales, LS ;
Algazy, JI ;
Kravitz, RL ;
Broder, MS ;
Kanouse, DE ;
Muñoz, JA ;
Puyol, JA ;
Lara, M ;
Watkins, KE ;
Yang, H ;
McGlynn, EA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (20) :2612-2621
[3]   Treatment decision-making by men with localized prostate cancer: the influence of personal factors [J].
Berry, DL ;
Ellis, WJ ;
Woods, NF ;
Schwien, C ;
Mullen, KH ;
Yang, C .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2003, 21 (02) :93-100
[4]  
Darmoni SJ, 2003, METHOD INFORM MED, V42, P220
[5]  
Diefenbach Michael A, 2002, Semin Urol Oncol, V20, P55, DOI 10.1053/suro.2002.30399
[6]   Patient education materials about the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer: A critical review [J].
Fagerlin, A ;
Rovner, D ;
Stableford, S ;
Jentoft, C ;
Wei, JT ;
Holmes-Rovner, M .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 140 (09) :721-728
[7]   Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet [J].
Gilliam, AD ;
Speake, WJ ;
Scholefield, JH ;
Beckingham, IJ .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2003, 85 (01) :44-46
[8]   Urology and the Internet: an evaluation of Internet use by urology patients and of information available on urological topics [J].
Hellawell, GO ;
Turner, KJ ;
Le Monnier, KJ ;
Brewster, SF .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 86 (03) :191-194
[9]  
Henson DE, 1999, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V86, P373, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<373::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Q