Global simulation of atmospheric mercury concentrations and deposition fluxes

被引:103
作者
Shia, RL
Seigneur, C
Pai, P
Ko, M
Sze, ND
机构
[1] Atmospher & Environm Res Inc, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] Atmospher & Environm Res Inc, San Ramon, CA 94583 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/1999JD900354
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Results from a numerical model of the global emissions, transport, chemistry, and deposition of mercury (Hg) in the atmosphere are presented. Hg tin the form of Hg(0) and Hg(LT)) is emitted into the atmosphere from natural and anthropogenic sources (estimated to be 4000 and 2100 Mg yr(-1), respectively). It is distributed between gaseous, aqueous and particulate phases. Removal of Hg from the atmosphere occurs via dry deposition and wet deposition, which are calculated by the model to be 3300 and 2800 Mg yr(-1), respectively. Deposition on land surfaces accounts for 47% of total global deposition. The simulated Hg ambient surface concentrations and deposition fluxes to the Earth's surface are consistent with available observations. Observed spatial and seasonal trends are reproduced by the model, although larger spatial variations are observed in Hg(0) surface concentrations than are predicted by the model. The calculated atmospheric residence time of Hg is similar to 1.7 years. Chemical transformations between Hg(0) and Hg(II) have a strong influence on Hg deposition patterns because Hg(II) is removed faster than Hg(0). Oxidation of Hg(0) to Hg(II) occurs primarily in the gas phase, whereas Hg(II) reduction to Hg(0) occurs solely in the aqueous phase. Our model results indicated that in the absence of the aqueous reactions the atmospheric residence time of Hg is reduced to 1.2 from 1.7 years and the Hg surface concentration is similar to 25% lower because of the absence of the Hg(II) reduction pathway. This result suggests that aqueous chemistry is an essential component of the atmospheric cycling of Hg.
引用
收藏
页码:23747 / 23760
页数:14
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Atmospheric mercury in the vapor phase, and in fine and coarse particulate matter at Perch River, New York [J].
Ames, M ;
Gullu, G ;
Olmez, I .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 32 (05) :865-872
[2]   Mercury in the global troposphere: a three-dimensional model study [J].
Bergan, T ;
Gallardo, L ;
Rodhe, H .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (10) :1575-1585
[3]  
BULLOCK R, 1997, ATMOSPHERIC DEPOSITI, P323
[4]   WET DEPOSITION OF MERCURY AND AMBIENT MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS AT A SITE IN THE LAKE CHAMPLAIN BASIN [J].
BURKE, J ;
HOYER, M ;
KEELER, G ;
SCHERBATSKOY, T .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 80 (1-4) :353-362
[5]   A global three-dimensional model of tropospheric sulfate [J].
Chin, M ;
Jacob, DJ ;
Gardner, GM ;
ForemanFowler, MS ;
Spiro, PA ;
Savoie, DL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D13) :18667-18690
[6]   AN INTENSIVE MULTISITE PILOT-STUDY INVESTIGATING ATMOSPHERIC MERCURY IN BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA [J].
DVONCH, JT ;
VETTE, AF ;
KEELER, GJ ;
EVANS, G ;
STEVENS, R .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 80 (1-4) :169-178
[7]  
Ebinghaus R., 1999, MERCURY CONTAMINATED, P1
[8]  
*EPA, 1997, EPA452R96001
[9]  
Fitzgerald W. F., 1994, P203
[10]  
Fitzgerald W. F., 1986, ROLE AIR SEA EXCHANG, P363