Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and computed electric field strength reduce stimulator-dependent differences in the motor threshold

被引:58
作者
Danner, Nils [1 ]
Julkunen, Petro [1 ]
Kononen, Mervi [1 ,2 ]
Saisanen, Laura [1 ]
Nurkkala, Jouko [1 ]
Karhu, Jari [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Neurophysiol, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[2] Kuopio Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland
[3] Nexstim Ltd, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; navigated brain stimulation; motor threshold; electric field; cortical excitability;
D O I
10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.06.032
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The motor threshold (MT) is a fundamental parameter for evaluating cortical excitability in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) despite remarkable variation, both within, and between subjects. We intended to test whether the variation could be reduced by targeting the stimulation on-line and modeling the TMS-induced electric field on individual MR images. Navigated TMS was used to map the primary motor cortex for the representation area of the thenar muscles (abductor pollicis brevis) and to determine the MT. Thirteen healthy subjects participated in the study. To determine the between-subject variation, the MTs of nine subjects were measured with two different stimulators (comparison study). To study the individual variation, the MT measurement was repeated 20 times in four subjects always using the same stimulator (longitudinal study). In the comparison study, the MTs differed significantly between the two stimulators over all subjects (p < 0.001), whereas the electric field strengths did not exhibit significant difference between the stimulators. Both, the MTs, and the electric field strengths showed similar variations, which were greater between subjects (comparison study) than within subjects (longitudinal study). In the comparison study, the distance between the locations of the two different coils on the scalp was significantly greater than the distance between the induced electric field maxima in the brain (p < 0.001). We conclude that on-line navigation can be used to reduce the variation caused by different stimulator types and individual subject anatomy. In addition, cortical excitability can be evaluated by using computed electric field strength as well as stimulator-dependent MT. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 122
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Awiszus F, 2003, SUPPL CLIN NEUROPHYS, V56, P13
[2]   Characterisation of paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation conditions yielding intracortical inhibition or I-wave facilitation using a threshold-hunting paradigm [J].
Awiszus, F ;
Feistner, H ;
Urbach, D ;
Bostock, H .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 129 (02) :317-324
[3]  
BARKER AT, 1985, LANCET, V1, P1106
[4]   Corticospinal excitability and sleep: a motor threshold assessment by transcranial magnetic stimulation after awakenings from REM and NREM sleep [J].
Bertini, M ;
Ferrara, M ;
De Gennaro, L ;
Curcio, G ;
Fratello, F ;
Romei, V ;
Pauri, F ;
Rossini, PM .
JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (01) :31-36
[5]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[6]   ELECTRIC VS MAGNETIC TRANS-CRANIAL STIMULATION OF THE BRAIN IN HEALTHY HUMANS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF CENTRAL MOTOR TRACTS CONDUCTIVITY AND EXCITABILITY [J].
CARAMIA, MD ;
PARDAL, AM ;
ZAROLA, F ;
ROSSINI, PM .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1989, 479 (01) :98-104
[7]  
Cicinelli P, 1997, MUSCLE NERVE, V20, P535, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199705)20:5<535::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-A
[9]   Hemispheric asymmetries of cortico-cortical connections in human hand motor areas [J].
Civardi, C ;
Cavalli, A ;
Naldi, P ;
Varrasi, C ;
Cantello, R .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2000, 111 (04) :624-629
[10]   Cortical excitability and sleep deprivation: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study [J].
Civardi, C ;
Boccagni, C ;
Vicentini, R ;
Bolamperti, L ;
Tarletti, R ;
Varrasi, C ;
Monaco, F ;
Cantello, R .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 71 (06) :809-812