Effect of lignocaine and pH on propofol-induced pain

被引:64
作者
Eriksson, M
Englesson, S
Niklasson, F
Hartvig, P
机构
[1] UNIV UPPSALA HOSP,DEPT CLIN CHEM,S-75185 UPPSALA,SWEDEN
[2] UNIV UPPSALA HOSP,HOSP PHARM,S-75185 UPPSALA,SWEDEN
关键词
formulations; propofol; pH; pain; injection; anaesthetics i.v; anaesthetics local; lignocaine;
D O I
10.1093/bja/78.5.502
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Propofol has the disadvantage of pain on injection. A higher partition of propofol in the aqueous phase of the preparation causes a higher incidence of pain on injection while addition of 1% lignocaine to propofol reduces pain. The low concentration of this local anaesthetic and the rapid pain relief observed indicates that mechanisms other than local anaesthesia are involved, that is change in pH. We performed a clinical study to investigate the influence of lignocaine and pH on pain during injection of 1% Diprivan. Ten parts of 1% Diprivan were mixed with one part of saline, 1% lignocaine or hydrochloric acid to achieve the same pH as that after addition of lignocaine. Diprivan 1% mixed with 1% lignocaine and with hydrochloric acid gave mean pain ratings (1-10) of 0.32 (so 0.75) (n=25) and 0.88 (1.30) (n=24), respectively. These ratings were significantly lower than ratings after injection of a saline-Diprivan mixture (2.18 (2.06), n=22). The pH of the 1% Diprivan formulation decreased after mixing with 1% lignocaine. The concentration of propofol in the aqueous phase was lower when 1% Diprivan was mixed with 1% lignocaine (0.376 g litre(-1)) or HCl (0.392 g litre(-1)) compared with 1% Diprivan and saline (0.476 g litre(-1)) mixed in the same proportion. Thus pH changes may modify propofol-induced pain on injection by a mechanism different from the effect of the local anaesthetic on the vascular endothelium. Our findings may explain why lignocaine mixed with propofol causes less pain than injection of lignocaine followed by propofol.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 506
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   PAIN EVOKED BY POLYMODAL STIMULATION OF HAND VEINS IN HUMANS [J].
ARNDT, JO ;
KLEMENT, W .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1991, 440 :467-478
[2]  
BABL J, 1995, EUR HOSP PHARM, V1, P15
[3]   EFFECT OF LIGNOCAINE ON PAIN CAUSED BY PROPOFOL INJECTION [J].
BROOKER, J ;
HULL, CJ ;
STAFFORD, M .
ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 40 (01) :91-92
[4]  
DERBYSHIRE DR, 1984, BRIT J ANAESTH, V56, P849
[5]   PRILOCAINE REDUCES INJECTION PAIN CAUSED BY PROPOFOL [J].
ERIKSSON, M .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 39 (02) :210-213
[6]   PREVENTION OF PAIN DURING INJECTION OF PROPOFOL [J].
EWART, MC ;
WHITWAM, JG .
LANCET, 1990, 335 (8692) :798-799
[7]   PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL - COMPARISON OF LIGNOCAINE WITH METOCLOPRAMIDE [J].
GANTA, R ;
FEE, JPH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (03) :316-317
[8]  
GRAN L, 1983, ANAESTHESIST, V32, P475
[9]   PAIN ON INJECTION OF PROPOFOL - METHODS OF ALLEVIATION [J].
JOHNSON, RA ;
HARPER, NJN ;
CHADWICK, S ;
VOHRA, A .
ANAESTHESIA, 1990, 45 (06) :439-442
[10]  
KIRK G A, 1992, Anesthesiology (Hagerstown), V77, pA407, DOI 10.1097/00000542-199209001-00407