Identifying key factors and strategies for reducing industrial CO2 emissions from a non-Kyoto protocol member's (Taiwan) perspective

被引:29
作者
Lin, SJ [1 ]
Lu, IJ
Lewis, C
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, SERC, Dept Environm Engn, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Resources Engn, Tainan 701, Taiwan
关键词
CO2; emission analysis; divisia index; emission coefficient; energy intensity; industrial structure; CO2 reduction strategy;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2005.08.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this study we use Divisia index approach to identify key factors affecting CO, emission changes of industrial sectors in Taiwan. The changes of CO2 emission are decomposed into emission coefficient, energy intensity, industrial structure and economic growth. Furthermore, comparisons with USA, Japan, Germany, the Netherlands and South Korea are made to have a better understanding of emission tendency in these countries and to help formulate our CO, reduction strategies for responding to the international calls for CO, cuts. The results show that economic growth and high energy intensity were two key factors for the rapid increase of industrial CO2 emission in Taiwan, while adjustment of industrial structure was the main component for the decrease. Although economic development is important, Taiwan must keep pace with the international trends for CO, reduction. Among the most important strategies are continuous efforts to improve energy intensity, fuel mix toward lower carbon, setting targets for industrial CO2 cuts, and advancing green technology through technology transfer. Also, the clean development mechanism (CDM) is expected to play an important role in the future. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1499 / 1507
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   DECOMPOSITION OF INDUSTRIAL ENERGY-CONSUMPTION - SOME METHODOLOGICAL AND APPLICATION ISSUES [J].
ANG, BW ;
LEE, SY .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1994, 16 (02) :83-92
[2]   The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2005, 33 (07) :867-871
[3]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[4]   Decomposition of energy-induced CO2 emissions in manufacturing [J].
Ang, BW ;
Pandiyan, G .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1997, 19 (03) :363-374
[5]   Contributions of weather and fuel mix to recent declines in US energy and carbon intensity [J].
Davis, WB ;
Sanstad, AH ;
Koomey, JG .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2003, 25 (04) :375-396
[6]   Decomposing the variation of aggregate electricity intensity in Spanish industry [J].
González, PF ;
Suárez, RP .
ENERGY, 2003, 28 (02) :171-184
[7]   A case-control study of melanomas of the soles and palms (Australia and Scotland) [J].
Green, A ;
McCredie, M ;
MacKie, R ;
Giles, G ;
Young, P ;
Morton, C ;
Jackman, L ;
Thursfield, V .
CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 1999, 10 (01) :21-25
[8]   MANUFACTURING ENERGY USE IN 8 OECD COUNTRIES - DECOMPOSING THE IMPACTS OF CHANGES IN OUTPUT, INDUSTRY STRUCTURE AND ENERGY INTENSITY [J].
HOWARTH, RB ;
SCHIPPER, L ;
DUERR, PA ;
STROM, S .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1991, 13 (02) :135-142
[9]  
LIN F. H., 1996, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.1
[10]  
LIN SJ, 2004, ENERGY Q, V34, P2