Stream-stage response tests and their joint interpretation with pumping tests

被引:17
作者
Rötting, TS [1 ]
Carrera, J [1 ]
Bolzicco, J [1 ]
Salvany, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Catalonia, Dept Geotech Engn & Geosci, Barcelona 08028, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00138.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Hydraulic head response to stream-stage variations can be used to explore the hydraulic properties of stream-aquifer systems at a relatively large scale. These stream-stage response tests, also called flooding tests, are typically interpreted using one- or two-dimensional models that assume flow perpendicular to the river. Therefore, they cannot be applied to systems that are both horizontally and vertically heterogeneous. In this work, we use the geostatistical inverse problem to jointly interpret data from stream-stage response and pumping tests. The latter tests provide flow data (which are needed to resolve aquifer diffusivity into transmissivity and storage coefficient) and may supply supplementary small-scale information. Here, we summarize the methodology for the design, execution, and joint numerical interpretation of these tests. Application to the Aznalcollar case study allows us to demonstrate that the proposed methodology may help in responding to questions such as the continuity of aquitards, the role and continuity of highly permeable paleochannels, or the time evolution of stream-aquifer interaction. These results expand the applicability and scope of stream-stage response tests.
引用
收藏
页码:371 / 385
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Two-dimensional advective transport in ground-water flow parameter estimation [J].
Anderman, ER ;
Hill, MC ;
Poeter, EP .
GROUND WATER, 1996, 34 (06) :1001-1009
[2]   Determination of specific yield for the Biscayne Aquifer with a canal-drawdown test [J].
Bolster, CH ;
Genereux, DP ;
Saiers, JE .
GROUND WATER, 2001, 39 (05) :768-777
[3]   A DISCUSSION ON VALIDATION OF HYDROGEOLOGICAL MODELS [J].
CARRERA, J ;
MOUSAVI, SF ;
USUNOFF, EJ ;
SANCHEZVILA, X ;
GALARZA, G .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1993, 42 (2-3) :201-216
[4]   Inverse problem in hydrogeology [J].
Carrera, J ;
Alcolea, A ;
Medina, A ;
Hidalgo, J ;
Slooten, LJ .
HYDROGEOLOGY JOURNAL, 2005, 13 (01) :206-222
[5]   ESTIMATION OF AQUIFER PARAMETERS UNDER TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS .2. UNIQUENESS, STABILITY, AND SOLUTION ALGORITHMS [J].
CARRERA, J ;
NEUMAN, SP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (02) :211-227
[6]   ESTIMATION OF AQUIFER PARAMETERS UNDER TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS .1. MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD METHOD INCORPORATING PRIOR INFORMATION [J].
CARRERA, J ;
NEUMAN, SP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (02) :199-210
[7]   ESTIMATION OF AQUIFER PARAMETERS UNDER TRANSIENT AND STEADY-STATE CONDITIONS .3. APPLICATION TO SYNTHETIC AND FIELD DATA [J].
CARRERA, J ;
NEUMAN, SP .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1986, 22 (02) :228-242
[8]  
CARRERA J, 2001, IAHS PUBLICATION, V275, P407
[9]   ITERATIVE QUASI-3-DIMENSIONAL FINITE-ELEMENT MODEL FOR HETEROGENEOUS MULTI-AQUIFER SYSTEMS [J].
CHORLEY, DW ;
FRIND, EO .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1978, 14 (05) :943-952
[10]  
Cooper H. H., 1963, 1536J USGS