Procedures in complex systems: The airline cockpit

被引:57
作者
Degani, A
Wiener, EL
机构
[1] NASA,AMES RES CTR,MOFFETT FIELD,CA 94035
[2] UNIV MIAMI,CORAL GABLES,FL 33124
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS | 1997年 / 27卷 / 03期
关键词
Number:; NCC2-581; Acronym:; -; Sponsor:; NCC2-327; ARC; Sponsor: Ames Research Center; Sponsor: University of Miami;
D O I
10.1109/3468.568739
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In complex human-machine systems, successful operations depend on an elaborate set of procedures which are specified by the operational management of the organization, These procedures indicate to the human operator (in this case the pilot) the manner in which operational management intends to have various tasks done, The intent is to provide guidance to the pilots and to ensure a sake, logical, efficient, and predictable (standardized) means of carrying out the objectives of the job, However, procedures can become a hodge-podge. Inconsistent or illogical procedures may lead to noncompliance by operators, Based on a held study with three major airlines, the authors propose a model for procedure development called the ''Four P's'': philosophy, policies, procedures, and practices, Using this model as a framework, the authors discuss the intricate issue of designing flight-deck procedures, and propose a conceptual approach for designing any set of procedures. The various factors, bath external and internal to the cockpit, that must be considered for procedure design are presented, In particular, the paper addresses the development of procedures for automated cockpits-a decade-long, and highly controversial issue in commercial aviation. Although this paper is based on airline operations, we assume that the principles discussed here are also applicable to other high-risk supervisory control systems, such as space flight, manufacturing process control, nuclear power production, and military operations.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 312
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 177642 NASA AM RES C
[2]  
[Anonymous], 177587 NASA AM RES C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1979, SIMULATOR STUDY INTE
[4]  
[Anonymous], AVIATION PSYCHOL PRA
[5]  
[Anonymous], NTSBAAR8805
[6]  
Degani A, 1992, 177605 NASA AM RES C
[7]  
Degani A, 1990, 177549 NASA AM RES C
[8]   SCIENCE, VALUES, AND HUMAN JUDGMENT [J].
HAMMOND, KR ;
ADELMAN, L .
SCIENCE, 1976, 194 (4263) :389-396
[9]   Quantitative measurement of observed workload in the analysis of aircrew performance [J].
Laudeman, IV ;
Palmer, EA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AVIATION PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 5 (02) :187-197
[10]  
LAUTMAN L, 1987, BOEING AIRLINER APR, P1