An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of bone cements used in percutaneous vertebroplasty

被引:91
作者
Belkoff, SM [1 ]
Maroney, M [1 ]
Fenton, DC [1 ]
Mathis, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
biomechanical evaluation; bone cement; compression fractures; spine; vertebroplasty;
D O I
10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00128-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the strength and stiffness of osteoporotic vertebral bodies (VBs) subjected to compression fractures and subsequently treated with bipedicular injections of various polymethylmethacrylate cements, Ten spines were harvested from nonembalmed female cadavers (age 68.6 +/- 13.7 years) and evaluated for bone mineral density using the dual energy X-ray absorptiometry method (t-score = -2.3 +/- 2.4). The 50 VBs (L1-L5) were disarticulated, compressed in a materials testing machine to determine initial strength and stiffness, and then assigned to one of six groups. Two of these groups (n = 8, n = 9) concerned experimental elements, the results of which are not reported here. The 33 vertebral bodies in the remaining four groups were left untreated or were repaired using a transpedicular injection of one of three commercially available polymethylmethacrylate cements. These four groups were: a) no treatment (no cement, n = 8); b) Simplex P (n = 9); c) Cranioplastic (n = 8); and d) Osteobond (n = 8), The VBs were then compressed again according to the initial protocol, and posttreatment strength and stiffness were measured. Results suggested that bipedicular injection of Simplex P and Osteobond restored VB stiffness to initial values, whereas VBs injected with Cranioplastic were significantly less stiff than in their initial state. VBs injected with cement (regardless of type) were significantly stronger than they were initially. (Bone 25:23S-26S; 1999) (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc, All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23S / 26S
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BOSTROM MP, 1997, SPINE, V22, pS39
[2]   Percutaneous vertebroplasty: State of the art [J].
Cotten, A ;
Boutry, N ;
Cortet, B ;
Assaker, R ;
Demondion, X ;
Leblond, D ;
Chastanet, P ;
Duquesnoy, B ;
Deramond, H .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 1998, 18 (02) :311-320
[3]   Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: Effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up [J].
Cotten, A ;
Dewatre, F ;
Cortet, B ;
Assaker, R ;
Leblond, D ;
Duquesnoy, B ;
Chastanet, P ;
Clarisse, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 200 (02) :525-530
[4]  
Debussche-Depriester C., 1991, NEURORADIOLOGY, V33, P149
[5]  
Deramond H., 1997, Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, V1, P285, DOI 10.1055/s-2008-1080150
[6]   PREDICTION OF VERTEBRAL STRENGTH BY DUAL PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY AND QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
ERIKSSON, SAV ;
ISBERG, BO ;
LINDGREN, JU .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (04) :243-250
[7]  
GALIBERT P, 1987, NEUROCHIRURGIE, V33, P166
[8]  
GANGI A, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P83
[9]   CHARACTERIZATION OF POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT [J].
HAAS, SS ;
BRAUER, GM ;
DICKSON, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1975, A 57 (03) :380-391
[10]  
HAYES WC, 1991, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V29, P1