Proportional intensity models robustness with overhaul intervals

被引:4
作者
Jiang, ST [1 ]
Landers, TL [1 ]
Rhoads, TR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Coll Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
repairable systems; semi-parametric proportional intensity models; major repairs; overhauls; dormancy; preventive maintenance; risk-free-intervals;
D O I
10.1002/qre.713
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The class of semi-parametric proportional intensity (PI) models applies to recurrent failure event modeling for a repairable system with explanatory variables (covariates). Certain repairable systems (e.g. aircraft and electrical power generating plants) experience a substantial period of downtime due to performing maintenance (i.e. major overhaul) at scheduled intervals or following a major failure. Other systems (e.g. emergency power units) experience extended periods of non-operating dormancy. These discontinuities in observation time have potential effects oil the accuracy of estimation for covariate effects, particularly where calendar time is the life metric. This paper examines the robustness of two PI methods (Prentice-Williams-Peterson gap time (PWP-GT) and Andersen-Gill (AG)) as a function of the overhaul or dormancy duration. The PWP-GT model proves to perform well for sample size of 60 (30 per level of a class covariate), constant or moderately decreasing/increasing rate of occurrence of failures, and relative overhaul (dormancy) durations less than half of the immediately preceding interval between failures. The AG model performs consistently well for a small sample size of 20 (10 per level of a class covariate) for homogeneous Poisson processes, regardless of the relative overhaul (dormancy) duration. Copyright (C) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 263
页数:13
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] COX REGRESSION-MODEL FOR COUNTING-PROCESSES - A LARGE SAMPLE STUDY
    ANDERSEN, PK
    GILL, RD
    [J]. ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1982, 10 (04) : 1100 - 1120
  • [2] Analysing maintenance data to gain insight into systems performance
    Ansell, J
    Archibald, T
    Dagpunar, J
    Thomas, L
    Abell, P
    Duncalf, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2003, 54 (04) : 343 - 349
  • [3] Practical aspects of modelling of repairable systems data using proportional hazards models
    Ansell, JI
    Phillips, MJ
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1997, 58 (02) : 165 - 171
  • [4] PRACTICAL RELIABILITY DATA-ANALYSIS
    ANSELL, JI
    PHILLIPS, MJ
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1990, 28 (03) : 337 - 356
  • [5] Ansell JI, 1989, APPL STAT-J ROY ST C, V38, P205
  • [6] ANSELMETTI D, 2000, SINGLE MOL, V1, P17
  • [7] Ascher H., 1984, Lecture Notes in Statist, V7
  • [8] Ascher H., 1983, ELECT SYSTEMS EFFECT, P119
  • [9] APPLYING PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELING IN RELIABILITY
    BENDELL, A
    WIGHTMAN, DW
    WALKER, EV
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1991, 34 (01) : 35 - 53
  • [10] BLANKS HS, 1987, P ANNU REL MAINT SYM, P165