Phase I trial evaluating the concurrent combination of radiotherapy and capecitabine in rectal cancer

被引:174
作者
Dunst, J
Reese, T
Sutter, T
Zühlke, H
Hinke, A
Kölling-Schlebusch, K
Frings, S
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Radiotherapy, Clin Radiotherapy, D-06097 Halle An Der Saale, Germany
[2] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Clin Gen Surg, D-06097 Halle An Der Saale, Germany
[3] WiSP Res Inst, Langenfeld, Germany
[4] Hoffmann La Roche Inc, Nutley, NJ 07110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2002.02.049
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose : To establish the feasibility of concurrent radiotherapy and capecitabine and define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) in patients with rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Thirty-six patients with rectal cancer received treatment in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or palliative setting with a total irradiation dose of 50.4 Gy with 1.8 Gy/d in approximately 6 weeks. Capecitabine was administered at escalating doses from 250 to 1,250 mg/m(2) bid (including weekends) for the duration of radiotherapy. The MTD was defined when two or more patients in a cohort of three or six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Results: Dose-limiting grade 3 hand-foot syndrome was observed in two of six patients treated at a capecitabine dose of 1,000 mg/m(2) bid. Other toxicities were generally rare and/or mild, with only one case of non-dose-limiting grade 3 diarrhea and a single patient with grade 3 skin toxicity. Myelosuppression consisted mainly of leukocytopenia, with a maximum severity of grade 2. Thus, a dosage of 825 mg/m(2) bid is the recommended dose level for further evaluation. One pathologic complete remission of a T3N1 tumor and nine partial remissions were observed in 10 patients treated in the neoadjuvant setting. Conclusion: The recommended dose for phase 11 evaluation is capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) bid, administered without break during a conventional radiotherapy period of about 6 weeks. This combined-modality approach proved to be a feasible and well-tolerated treatment option with promising preliminary efficacy results in rectal cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3983 / 3991
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1985, NEW ENGL J MED, V312, P1465
  • [2] Blum JL, 2001, CANCER, V92, P1759, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:7<1759::AID-CNCR1691>3.0.CO
  • [3] 2-A
  • [4] Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer
    Blum, JL
    Jones, SE
    Buzdar, AU
    LoRusso, PM
    Kuter, I
    Vogel, C
    Osterwalder, B
    Burger, HU
    Brown, CS
    Griffin, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (02) : 485 - 493
  • [5] Preliminary studies of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate: Capecitabine
    Budman, DR
    Meropol, NJ
    Reigner, B
    Creaven, PJ
    Lichtman, SM
    Berghorn, E
    Behr, J
    Gordon, RJ
    Osterwalder, B
    Griffin, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 16 (05) : 1795 - 1802
  • [6] PHARMACOLOGIC REQUIREMENTS FOR OBTAINING SENSITIZATION OF HUMAN-TUMOR CELLS-INVITRO TO COMBINED 5-FLUOROURACIL OR FTORAFUR AND X-RAYS
    BYFIELD, JE
    CALABROJONES, P
    KLISAK, I
    KULHANIAN, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1982, 8 (11): : 1923 - 1933
  • [7] PHASE-I AND PHASE-II TRIAL OF 5-DAY INFUSED 5-FLUOROURACIL AND RADIATION IN ADVANCED CANCER OF THE HEAD AND NECK
    BYFIELD, JE
    SHARP, TR
    FRANKEL, SS
    TANG, SG
    CALLIPARI, FB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1984, 2 (05) : 406 - 413
  • [8] HALL WH, 1990, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V264, P1444
  • [9] HOFF P, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, P993
  • [10] Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of a randomized phase III study
    Hoff, PM
    Ansari, R
    Batist, G
    Cox, J
    Kocha, W
    Kuperminc, M
    Maroun, J
    Walde, D
    Weaver, C
    Harrison, E
    Burger, HU
    Osterwalder, B
    Wang, AO
    Wong, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (08) : 2282 - 2292