Litter use by laying hens in a commercial aviary: dust bathing and piling

被引:54
作者
Campbell, D. L. M. [1 ]
Makagon, M. M. [2 ]
Swanson, J. C. [1 ]
Siegford, J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Anim Behav & Welf Grp, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Anim Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
behavior; welfare; aviary; laying hen; dust bathing; EGG-PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION; BEHAVIOR; CAGES; HYSTERIA; LOCATION; SPACE;
D O I
10.3382/ps/pev183
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The laying hen industry, including in the United States, is responding to social concerns about hen welfare by implementing alternative housing systems such as the aviary, to provide more space and resources to large groups of hens. Data detailing the behavior of hens in commercial aviaries is needed to determine hens' use of the resources in order to understand their impact on hen welfare. The open litter area of aviaries provides additional space for hens during the day. Litter is also a substrate for dust bathing which is a strongly motivated natural behavior. Hens are often synchronous in their performance of dust bathing, which may lead to overcrowding in the litter area. Additionally, the open litter area can facilitate expression of unusual behavior such as flock piling (defined as the occurrence of densely grouped clusters of hens, resulting from no obvious cause and occurring randomly throughout the day and flock cycle) which may be a welfare concern. Therefore, we conducted observations of hen occupancy of the open litter area and the performance of dust bathing and flock piling across 3 production points (peak lay, mid lay and end of lay) for two flocks of Lohmann White laying hens housed in a commercial aviary. All areas of the open litter area were occupied to the same degree. Hens performed dust bathing throughout the day but showed peak dust bathing activity in the afternoon for Flock 1 (all P < 0.001) and in the late morning for Flock 2 (all P < 0.001). Overall, 174 incidents of piling behavior were observed between the 2 flocks, with piles varying in size, duration, and time of occurrence; however, no smothering was detected. Crowding on the open litter area sometimes occurred during peak periods of synchronous dust bathing and when hens piled. Further research is needed to understand the welfare implications of individual hen use of the open litter area and the causes and welfare implications of hen piling.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 175
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Appleby MC, 2004, ANIM WELFARE, V13, P313
[2]   Smothering in UK free-range flocks. Part 1: incidence, location, timing and management [J].
Barrett, J. ;
Rayner, A. C. ;
Gill, R. ;
Willings, T. H. ;
Bright, A. .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2014, 175 (01) :19-+
[3]  
Blatchford R. A., 2014, P 48 C INT SOC APPL
[4]   Smothering in commercial free-range laying hens: a preliminary investigation [J].
Bright, A. ;
Johnson, E. A. .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2011, 168 (19)
[5]   Laying hens in large necks in a perchery system: influence of stocking density on location, use of resources and behaviour [J].
Carmichael, NL ;
Walker, AW ;
Hughes, BO .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (02) :165-176
[6]   Spatial distribution and behaviour of laying hens housed in an alternative system [J].
Channing, CE ;
Hughes, BO ;
Walker, AW .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2001, 72 (04) :335-345
[7]   Motivation to dust-bathe of laying hens housed in cages and in aviaries [J].
Colson, S. ;
Arnould, C. ;
Michel, V. .
ANIMAL, 2007, 1 (03) :433-437
[8]   Behavioural priorities of laying hens [J].
Cooper, JJ ;
Albentosa, MJ .
AVIAN AND POULTRY BIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2003, 14 (03) :127-149
[9]   External factors and causation of dustbathing in domestic hens [J].
Duncan, IJH ;
Widowski, TM ;
Malleau, AE ;
Lindberg, AC ;
Petherick, JC .
BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 1998, 43 (02) :219-228
[10]   Forced to crowd or choosing to cluster? Spatial distribution indicates social attraction in broiler chickens [J].
Febrer, Kian ;
Jones, Tracey A. ;
Donnelly, Christl A. ;
Dawkins, Marian Stamp .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2006, 72 :1291-1300