The evaluation of preprocessing choices in single-subject BOLD fMRI using NPAIRS performance metrics

被引:87
作者
LaConte, S [1 ]
Anderson, J
Muley, S
Ashe, J
Frutiger, S
Rehm, K
Hansen, LK
Yacoub, E
Hu, XP
Rottenberg, D
Strother, S
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Ctr Magnet Resonance Res, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] VA Med Ctr, PET Imaging Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55417 USA
[3] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Math Modeling, Lyngby, Denmark
[4] Univ Minnesota, Dept Neurol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Radiol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/nimg.2002.1300
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This work proposes an alternative to simulation-based receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for assessment of fMRI data analysis methodologies. Specifically, we apply the rapidly developing nonparametric prediction, activation, influence, and reproducibility resampling (NPAIRS) framework to obtain cross-validation-based model performance estimates of prediction accuracy and global reproducibility for various degrees of model complexity. We rely on the concept of an analysis chain meta-model in which all parameters of the preprocessing steps along with the final statistical model are treated as estimated model parameters. Our ROC analog, then, consists of plotting prediction vs. reproducibility results as curves of model complexity for competing meta-models. Two theoretical underpinnings are crucial to utilizing this new validation technique. First, we explore the relationship between global signal-to-noise and our reproducibility estimates as derived previously. Second, we submit our model complexity curves in the prediction versus reproducibility space as reflecting classic bias-variance tradeoffs. Among the particular analysis chains considered, we found little impact in performance metrics with alignment, some benefit with temporal detrending, and greatest improvement with spatial smoothing. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 27
页数:18
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   The inferential impact of global signal covariates in functional neuroimaging analyses [J].
Aguirre, GK ;
Zarahn, E ;
D'Esposito, M .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 8 (03) :302-306
[2]   A critique of the use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistic for the analysis of BOLD fMRI data [J].
Aguirre, GK ;
Zarahn, E ;
D'Esposito, M .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1998, 39 (03) :500-505
[3]   STATISTICAL PREDICTOR IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
ANNALS OF THE INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL MATHEMATICS, 1970, 22 (02) :203-&
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEUROIMAGE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Multivariate analysis
[6]   Nonadditive two-way ANOVA for event-related fMRI data analysis [J].
Auffermann, WF ;
Ngan, SC ;
Sarkar, S ;
Yacoub, E ;
Hu, XP .
NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 14 (02) :406-416
[7]   TIME COURSE EPI OF HUMAN BRAIN-FUNCTION DURING TASK ACTIVATION [J].
BANDETTINI, PA ;
WONG, EC ;
HINKS, RS ;
TIKOFSKY, RS ;
HYDE, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1992, 25 (02) :390-397
[8]   PROCESSING STRATEGIES FOR TIME-COURSE DATA SETS IN FUNCTIONAL MRI OF THE HUMAN BRAIN [J].
BANDETTINI, PA ;
JESMANOWICZ, A ;
WONG, EC ;
HYDE, JS .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1993, 30 (02) :161-173
[9]   Characterizing stimulus-response functions using nonlinear regressors in parametric fMRI experiments [J].
Buchel, C ;
Holmes, AP ;
Rees, G ;
Friston, KJ .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 8 (02) :140-148
[10]   How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data? [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Horwitz, B ;
Honey, G ;
Brammer, M ;
Williams, S ;
Sharma, T .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (04) :289-301