The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration

被引:579
作者
Bossuyt, PM
Reitsma, JB
Bruns, DE
Gatsonis, CA
Glasziou, PP
Irwig, LM
Moher, D
Rennie, D
de Vet, HCW
Lijmer, JG
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Acad Med Ctr, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Pathol, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[3] Brown Univ, Ctr Stat Sci, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[4] Univ Queensland, Ctr Gen Practice, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Dept Publ Hlth & Commun Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[6] Chalmers Res Grp, Ottawa, ON K1N 6M4, Canada
[7] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
[8] Free Univ Amsterdam, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1373/49.1.7
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy is less than optimal. Complete and accurate reporting is necessary to enable readers to assess the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate the generalisability of the results. A group of scientists and editors has developed the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy) statement to improve the reporting the quality of reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy. The statement consists of a checklist of 25 items and flow diagram that authors can use to ensure that all relevant information is present. This explanatory document aims to facilitate the use, understanding and dissemination of the checklist. The document contains a clarification of the meaning, rationale and optimal use of each item on the checklist, as well as a short summary of the available evidence on bias and applicability. The STARD statement, checklist, flowchart and this explanation and elaboration document should be useful resources to improve reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Complete and informative reporting can only lead to better decisions in healthcare.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 18
页数:12
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Anton RF, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P1769
[2]   ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS WHEN DISEASE VERIFICATION IS SUBJECT TO SELECTION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
GREENES, RA .
BIOMETRICS, 1983, 39 (01) :207-215
[3]   BIASES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS [J].
BEGG, CB .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (04) :411-423
[4]  
BEGG CB, 1986, J CHRON DIS, V39, P575
[5]   TENTATIVE DIAGNOSES FACILITATE THE DETECTION OF DIVERSE LESIONS IN CHEST RADIOGRAPHS [J].
BERBAUM, KS ;
FRANKEN, EA ;
DORFMAN, DD ;
BARLOON, T ;
ELL, SR ;
LU, CH ;
SMITH, W ;
ABUYOUSEF, MM .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1986, 21 (07) :532-539
[6]  
Bizzaro N, 2001, CLIN CHEM, V47, P1089
[7]   Sonohysterography: a prospective survey of results and complications in 81 patients [J].
Bonnamy, L ;
Marret, H ;
Perrotin, F ;
Body, G ;
Berger, C ;
Lansac, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 102 (01) :42-47
[8]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 49 (01) :1-6
[9]   Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative [J].
Bossuyt, PM ;
Reitsma, JB ;
Bruns, DE ;
Gatsonis, CA ;
Glasziou, PP ;
Irwig, LM ;
Lijmer, JG ;
Moher, D ;
Rennie, D ;
de Vet, HCW .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 138 (01) :40-44
[10]   Methodological standards in radiographer plain film reading performance studies [J].
Brealey, S ;
Scally, AJ ;
Thomas, NB .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2002, 75 (890) :107-113