Gaps in parental understandings and experiences of vaccine-preventable diseases: a qualitative study

被引:30
作者
Hilton, S. [1 ]
Hunt, K. [1 ]
Petticrew, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] MRC Social & Publ Hlth Sci Unit, Glasgow G12 8RZ, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
health beliefs; immunization; infectious diseases; parents; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00647.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objective To explore parents' understandings of the diseases included in the current UK Childhood Immunization Programme (CIP), and the role of first- and second-hand experiences of these diseases in assessments of their severity. Methods A qualitative study in which 66 parents (58 mothers and 8 fathers) of children aged 6 years and below, and six mothers of immuno-compromised children, took part in 18 focus group discussions between November 2002 and March 2003. Results There were many gaps in parents' knowledge about some vaccine-preventable diseases, most notably diphtheria, tetanus and haemophilus influenzae type b, three of the diseases covered by the pentavalent vaccine (introduced into the UK CIP in 2004). These gaps led some parents to question the need for vaccination. First-hand experiences of the diseases reinforced the need for vaccination in some cases (e.g. Men C), but undermined it in others (e.g. pertussis, measles, rubella, mumps). Poliomyelitis and diphtheria were no longer seen as a threat to children's health in Britain. Some parents saw mumps as only a threat to boys' health and rubella as only having relevance to girls'. Conclusions As fewer parents have direct experiences of vaccine-preventable diseases, there is an increasing need to provide parents with accessible information about these diseases. It is also important to recognize that direct or indirect experiences of any of the diseases may either heighten or diminish parents' assessments of the severity of these diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 179
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, The Peckham Report. National Immunisation Study: Factors Affecting Immunisation in Childhood
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, British Medical Journal, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.316.7130.561
[3]   Misconceptions about the new combination vaccine [J].
Bedford, H ;
Elliman, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 329 (7463) :411-412
[4]   Concerns about immunisation [J].
Bedford, H ;
Elliman, D .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7229) :240-243
[5]   Vaccine preventable diseases and immunisations: a qualitative study of mothers' perceptions of severity, susceptibility, benefits and barriers [J].
Bond, L ;
Nolan, T ;
Pattison, P ;
Carlin, J .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1998, 22 (04) :441-446
[6]   'Leaps of faith' and MMR: An empirical study of trust [J].
Brownlie, J ;
Howson, A .
SOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 39 (02) :221-239
[7]  
Carstairs V., 1991, DEPRIVATION HLTH SCO
[8]   Attitudes of parents towards measles and immunisation after a measles outbreak in an anthroposophical community [J].
Duffell, E .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (09) :685-686
[9]  
ELLIMAN D, 2005, ARCH DIS CHILD, V82, P280
[10]   MMR: risk, choice, chance [J].
Fitzpatrick, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2004, 69 :143-153