Willingness-to-pay for Borivli National Park: Evidence from a contingent valuation

被引:96
作者
Hadker, N
Sharma, S
David, A
Muraleedharan, TR
机构
[1] Indira Gandhi Inst. of Devmt. Res., General Vaidya Marg, Film City Road, Goregaon (E)
关键词
contingent valuation; double-dichotomous bid; starting point bias; hypothetical bias; embedding effects;
D O I
10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00094-8
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
A study was conducted to survey the residents of Bombay and elicit their willingness to pay for the maintainance and preservation of Borivli National Park (BNP) using the Contingent Valuation (CV) method, The CV method has come under considerable criticism on account of biases that are either inherent to, or generated by the survey process, The present study acknowledges those, and adopts techniques to either circumvent or then minimise them. The authors pay special attention to hypothetical bias, starting point bias, embedding effects and part-whole biases. The authors argue that indeed it is possible to improve the quality of a CV by using special survey as well as statistical techniques so that CV results can be used for the purposes of realistic decision making. This validation of the CV becomes an important objective of the study. Despite India being a developing country with medium to low income levels, the evidence suggested that people are willing to pay for preserving environmental amenities. Having statistically adjusted for embedding and anchoring effects, households are willing to pay exclusively for BNP, on average, Rs 7.5, per month, for the next five years, Extrapolating to the city of Bombay, this amounts to a substantial Rs 20 million each month for the next five years, or a present discounted value of in excess of Rs 1 billion, suggesting a strong interest in environmental conservation.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 122
页数:18
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ARROW K, 1993, REPORT NOAA PANEL CV
[2]  
BATEMAN I, 1993, 9305 GEC CSERGE UEA
[3]   MEASURING VALUES OF EXTRA-MARKET GOODS - ARE INDIRECT MEASURES BIASED [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
HEBERLEIN, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 61 (05) :926-930
[4]  
*BOMB METR REG DEV, 1990, MULT PURP HOUS SURV
[6]   EFFICIENT ESTIMATION METHODS FOR CLOSED-ENDED CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS [J].
CAMERON, TA ;
JAMES, MD .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1987, 69 (02) :269-276
[7]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[8]  
CUMMINGS R, 1986, VALUGING ENV GOODS A
[9]  
HADKER N, 1995, 121 IGIDR
[10]   STATISTICAL EFFICIENCY OF DOUBLE-BOUNDED DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE CONTINGENT VALUATION [J].
HANEMANN, M ;
LOOMIS, J ;
KANNINEN, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1991, 73 (04) :1255-1263