Prediction of global and local quality of CASP8 models by MULTICOM series

被引:49
作者
Cheng, Jianlin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Zheng [1 ]
Tegge, Allison N. [2 ]
Eickholt, Jesse [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Comp Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Inst Informat, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Bond Life Sci Ctr, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
protein structure prediction; protein model quality assessment; model quality assurance program; clustering; PROTEIN-STRUCTURE; REGIONS; SERVER;
D O I
10.1002/prot.22487
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Evaluating the quality of protein structure models is important for selecting and using models. Here, we describe the MULTICOM series of model quality predictors which contains three predictors tested in the CASP8 experiments. We evaluated these predictors on 120 CASP8 targets. The average correlations between predicted and real GDT-TS scores of the two semi-clustering methods (MULTICOM and MULTICOM-CLUSTER) and the one single-model ab initio method (MULTICOM-CMFR) are 0.90, 0.89, and 0.74, respectively; and their average difference (or GDT-TS loss) between the global GDT-TS scores of the top-ranked models and the best models are 0.05, 0.06, and 0.07, respectively. The average correlation between predicted and real local quality scores of the semi-clustering methods is above 0.64. Our results show that the novel semi-clustering approach that compares a model with top ranked reference models can improve initial quality scores generated by the ab initio method and a simple meta approach.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 184
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
ARCHIE J, PROTEINS IN PRESS
[2]   QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment [J].
Benkert, Pascal ;
Tosatto, Silvio C. E. ;
Schomburg, Dietmar .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 71 (01) :261-277
[3]   SCRATCH: a protein structure and structural feature prediction server [J].
Cheng, J ;
Randall, AZ ;
Sweredoski, MJ ;
Baldi, P .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2005, 33 :W72-W76
[4]   Predicting reliable regions in protein sequence alignments [J].
Cline, M ;
Hughey, R ;
Karplus, K .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 18 (02) :306-314
[5]   Assessment of predictions in the model quality assessment category [J].
Cozzetto, Domenico ;
Kryshtafovych, Andriy ;
Ceriani, Michele ;
Tramontano, Anna .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 69 :175-183
[6]   3D-Jury: a simple approach to improve protein structure predictions [J].
Ginalski, K ;
Elofsson, A ;
Fischer, D ;
Rychlewski, L .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2003, 19 (08) :1015-1018
[7]   Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition [J].
McGuffin, Liam J. .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 8 (1)
[8]   The ModFOLD server for the quality assessment of protein structural models [J].
McGuffin, Liam J. .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 24 (04) :586-587
[9]  
PALUSZEWSKI M, PROTEINS IN PRESS
[10]   Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression [J].
Qiu, Jian ;
Sheffler, Will ;
Baker, David ;
Noble, William Stafford .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2008, 71 (03) :1175-1182