Validity of a modified version of the Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire

被引:19
作者
Adams, RJ [1 ]
Ruffin, RE [1 ]
Smith, BJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Queen Elizabeth Hosp, Dept Med, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
关键词
Asthma Quality of Life; validity; questionnaires;
D O I
10.3109/02770900009055436
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
To produce a scale useful for individual clinical decision making, the Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ-M) was modified to a 22-item scale using a 7-point Likert response scale, and the validity of the new instrument was assessed. Adult asthma subjects with moderate to severe disease, recruited from two hospitals in Adelaide, Australia, were surveyed at baseline (n = 293), and at 3-month follow-up (n = 234). Cronbach's alpha for the Total scale of the modified AQLQ-M (MAQLQ-M) was 0.97 and all subscale values exceeded 0.90. Test-retest reliability values for all scales were between 0.88 and 0.93. All correlations between disease reference measures were statistically significant to at least the p < 0.01 level. Stronger associations were seen with symptom and self-rating scales than for lung function, medication usage, and health service utilization measures of outcome. The MAQLQ-M showed good discriminative ability for all asthma symptom categories and for different FEV,values. Moderate, statistically significant associations were seen between changes in MAQLQ-M scores and clinical measures. Higher baseline MAQLQ-M scores were associated with lower risks over 12 months for hospital admissions (odds ratio, OR = 0.58) and repeated emergency department visits (OR = 0.47). The MAQLQ-M is a highly valid measure of asthma-related quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 143
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Asthma prevalence, morbidity and management practices in South Australia, 1992-1995 [J].
Adams, R ;
Ruffin, R ;
Wakefield, M ;
Campbell, D ;
Smith, B .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 27 (06) :672-679
[2]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE IN ASTHMA .1. INTERNAL CONSISTENCY AND VALIDITY OF THE SF-36 QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
BOUSQUET, J ;
KNANI, J ;
DHIVERT, H ;
RICHARD, A ;
CHICOYE, A ;
WARE, JE ;
MICHEL, FB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 149 (02) :371-375
[3]   Practical approach to the use of outcomes in asthma - Traveling the road to better asthmatic care [J].
Bukstein, DA .
IMMUNOLOGY AND ALLERGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 16 (04) :859-+
[4]   Common problems in using, modifying, and reporting on classic measurement instruments [J].
Daltroy, LH .
ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 1997, 10 (06) :441-447
[5]   REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES - STATISTICS AND STRATEGIES FOR EVALUATION [J].
DEYO, RA ;
DIEHR, P ;
PATRICK, DL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1991, 12 (04) :S142-S158
[6]  
DIXON P, 1996, OUTCOME MEASUREMENT, V3
[7]   Reliability and validity of the asthma quality of life questionnaire marks in a sample of adult asthmatic patients in the United States [J].
Gupchup, GV ;
Wolfgang, AP ;
Thomas, J .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1997, 19 (05) :1116-1125
[8]  
GUYATT GH, 1986, CAN MED ASSOC J, V134, P889
[9]   EVALUATION OF THE MOS SF-36 PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING SCALE (PF-10) .1. UNIDIMENSIONALITY AND REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE RASCH ITEM SCALE [J].
HALEY, SM ;
MCHORNEY, CA ;
WARE, JE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (06) :671-684
[10]   PSYCHOTHERAPY OUTCOME RESEARCH - METHODS FOR REPORTING VARIABILITY AND EVALUATING CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE [J].
JACOBSON, NS ;
FOLLETTE, WC ;
REVENSTORF, D .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1984, 15 (04) :336-352