Endoleak: Predictive value for aneurysm growth at 3 years

被引:18
作者
Deaton, DH
Makaroun, MS
Fairman, RM
机构
[1] Chesapeake Vasc, Anne Arundel Med Ctr, Annapolis, MD 21401 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Div Vasc Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Penn, Div Vasc Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10016-001-0129-1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoleak is a unique radiographic finding after endovascular aneurysm repair. The prognostic implication of endoleak on aneurysm therapy outcome is unknown. Patients with 3 years of follow-up were examined to determine the predictive value of endoleak, as determined by the treating physician, for aneurysm growth. Patients enrolled in a clinical trial for a unibody, bifurcated endovascular graft (Ancure-Guidant/EVT, Menlo Park, CA) were examined with respect to endoleak, as determined by the primary investigator, and aneurysm diameter change. A total of 80 patients were available at 3 years for evaluation. CT scans and ultrasound were used to determine endoleak at discharge, at 6 months, and annually. Patients were categorized as no leak (NL; n = 59), early leak (EL, leak identified by 6 months; n = 15), and late leak (LL, leak identified at 12 months or later; n = 6). A change of 5 mm in transverse diameter relative to the original diameter was used to determine an increase or decrease. Therapeutic intervention for endoleak was analyzed separately in each group. From the results we were able to determine that most patients with distal type 1 or type 2 endoleak have shrinking or stable aneurysms. Endoleak is a poor predictor of aneurysm growth but is statistically associated with enlargement. Absence of endoleak is strongly, but not entirely, predictive of lack of aneurysm growth. Endoleak is a risk factor for aneurysm enlargement, warranting further investigation to examine the etiology of the image, but cannot be used as an endpoint for effective endovascular aneurysm treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Fillinger M F, 1999, Semin Vasc Surg, V12, P327
  • [2] Continued sac expansion in the absence of a demonstrable endoleak is an indication for secondary intervention
    Fisher, RK
    Brennan, JA
    Gilling-Smith, GL
    Harris, PL
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 20 (01) : 96 - 98
  • [3] Gilling-Smith G, 1999, J ENDOVASC SURG, V6, P305, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1999)006<0305:EAEARD>2.0.CO
  • [4] 2
  • [5] Freedom from endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair does not equal treatment success
    Gilling-Smith, GL
    Martin, J
    Sudhindran, S
    Gould, DA
    McWilliams, RG
    Bakran, A
    Brennen, JA
    Harris, PL
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2000, 19 (04) : 421 - 425
  • [6] Diagnosis and treatment of type II endoleak after stent placement for exclusion of an abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Haulon, S
    Willoteaux, S
    Koussa, M
    Gaxotte, V
    Beregi, JP
    Warembourg, H
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 15 (02) : 148 - 154
  • [7] Endoleak after aortic stent graft repair: Diagnosis by color duplex ultrasound scan versus computed tomography scan
    Sato, DT
    Goff, CD
    Gregory, RT
    Robinson, KD
    Carter, KA
    Herts, BR
    Vilsack, HB
    Gayle, RG
    Parent, FN
    DeMasi, RJ
    Meier, GH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 28 (04) : 657 - 663
  • [8] Experimental study of the influence of endoleak size on pressure in the aneurysm sac and the consequences of thrombosis
    Schurink, GWH
    Aarts, NJM
    van Baalen, JM
    Kool, LJS
    van Bockel, JH
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 87 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [9] Secondary endoleak or missed endoleak?
    Wever, JJ
    Blankensteijn, JD
    Eikelboom, BC
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 18 (05) : 458 - 460
  • [10] White GH, 1997, J ENDOVASC SURG, V4, P152, DOI 10.1583/1074-6218(1997)004<0152:EAACOE>2.0.CO