Role of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulator Slug in primary human cancers

被引:202
作者
Alves, Catarina Castro [2 ]
Carneiro, Fatima [2 ]
Hoefler, Heinz [1 ,3 ]
Becker, Karl-Friedrich [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Pathol, Trogerstr 18, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Porto, Inst Patol & Imunol Mol, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
[3] Deutsch Forschungszentrum Gesundheit & Umwelt GmB, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK | 2009年 / 14卷
关键词
Cadherin; Adhesion; Transcription Factor; Invasion; Metastasis; Review; E-CADHERIN EXPRESSION; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS SNAIL; REPRESSES E-CADHERIN; BREAST-CARCINOMA; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; TUMOR PROGRESSION; OVARIAN-CARCINOMA; MASTER REGULATOR; GENE-EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.2741/3433
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Epithelial- mesenchymal- transition (EMT) is a crucial process during morphogenesis of multi-cellular organisms. EMT not only is a normal developmental process but also plays a role in tumor invasion and metastasis. Indeed, molecules involved in EMT, such as the transcription factor and E-cadherin repressor Slug (SNAI2), have recently been demonstrated to be important for cancer cells to down-regulate epithelial markers and up-regulate mesenchymal markers in order to become motile and invasive. Here we summarize major studies focusing on Slug expression in human tumor samples. We review a total of 13 studies involving 1150 cases from 9 different types of tumors. It is becoming clear that this transcription factor plays a role in the progression of some tumor types, including breast and gastric cancer. Interestingly, Slug expression is not always associated with down-regulation of E-cadherin. The mode of action, the signaling pathways involved in its regulation, and the interplay with other EMT regulators need to be addressed in future studies in order to fully understand Slug's role in tumor progression.
引用
收藏
页码:3041 / 3050
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Slug is overexpressed in gastric carcinomas and may act synergistically with SIPI and Snail in the down-regulation of E-cadherin [J].
Alves, C. Castro ;
Rosivatz, E. ;
Schott, C. ;
Hollweck, R. ;
Becker, I. ;
Sarbia, M. ;
Carneiro, F. ;
Becker, K-F .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2007, 211 (05) :507-515
[2]   The transcription factor Snail is a repressor of E-cadherin gene expression in epithelial tumour cells [J].
Batlle, E ;
Sancho, E ;
Franci, C ;
Domínguez, D ;
Monfar, M ;
Baulida, J ;
de Herreros, AG .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2000, 2 (02) :84-89
[3]  
BIRCHMEIER W, 1993, SEMIN CANCER BIOL, V4, P231
[4]   CADHERIN EXPRESSION IN CARCINOMAS - ROLE IN THE FORMATION OF CELL-JUNCTIONS AND THE PREVENTION OF INVASIVENESS [J].
BIRCHMEIER, W ;
BEHRENS, J .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER, 1994, 1198 (01) :11-26
[5]   The transcription factor Slug represses E-cadherin expression and induces epithelial to mesenchymal transitions:: a comparison with Snail and E47 repressors [J].
Bolós, V ;
Peinado, H ;
Pérez-Moreno, MA ;
Fraga, MF ;
Esteller, M ;
Cano, A .
JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2003, 116 (03) :499-511
[6]   Focus on hepatocellular carcinoma [J].
Bruix, J ;
Boix, L ;
Sala, M ;
Llovet, JM .
CANCER CELL, 2004, 5 (03) :215-219
[7]   The transcription factor Snail controls epithelial-mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression [J].
Cano, A ;
Pérez-Moreno, MA ;
Rodrigo, I ;
Locascio, A ;
Blanco, MJ ;
del Barrio, MG ;
Portillo, F ;
Nieto, MA .
NATURE CELL BIOLOGY, 2000, 2 (02) :76-83
[8]  
Chen JJW, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P5223
[9]   Mechanisms of inactivation of E-cadherin in breast carcinoma: modification of the two-hit hypothesis of tumor suppressor gene [J].
Cheng, CW ;
Wu, PE ;
Yu, JC ;
Huang, CS ;
Yue, CT ;
Wu, CW ;
Shen, CY .
ONCOGENE, 2001, 20 (29) :3814-3823
[10]   Snail and slug play distinct roles during breast carcinoma progression [J].
Come, Christophe ;
Magnino, Fabrice ;
Bibeau, Frederic ;
Barbara, Pascal De Santa ;
Becker, Karl Friedrich ;
Theillet, Charles ;
Savagner, Pierre .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 12 (18) :5395-5402