Monitoring coping style moderates emotional reactions to genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study

被引:62
作者
Shiloh, S. [1 ]
Koehly, L. [2 ]
Jenkins, J. [2 ]
Martin, J. [3 ]
Hadley, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Psychol, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] NHGRI, Social Networks Methods Sect, Social & Behav Res Branch, Bethesda, MD USA
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
HNPCC; genetic testing; monitoring coping style; cancer; oncology;
D O I
10.1002/pon.1338
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: The emotional effects of genetic testing for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) provided within a counseling program were assessed among 253 individuals. Methods: Assessments were scheduled at baseline before testing, and again after 6 and 12 months post-test. Negative emotional reactions were evaluated using the Revised Impact of Event Scale and the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale. Monitoring coping style was assessed at baseline using the Miller Behavioral Style Scale. Results: Mean reductions were indicated in distress and depression levels within the first 6 months after counseling and testing. High monitors were generally more distressed than low monitors, specifically if they had indeterminate or positive results. Conclusions: Genetic counseling and testing for HNPCC do not result in long-term distress for most people. Of the variables investigated, only time and coping style have main effects on emotional reactions, and the impacts of mutation status are moderated by coping style. Psychological interventions, aimed to alleviate adverse emotional effects, were suggested for certain participants, i.e. recipients of positive or indeterminate results who are high monitors. Published in 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 755
页数:10
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC):: A prospective follow-up study [J].
Aktan-Collan, K ;
Haukkala, A ;
Mecklin, JP ;
Uutela, A ;
Kääriäinen, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 93 (04) :608-611
[2]   Psychological response to test results in an ovarian cancer screening program: A prospective, longitudinal study [J].
Andrykowski, MA ;
Boerner, LM ;
Salsman, JM ;
Pavlik, E .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 23 (06) :622-630
[3]   Psychological impact of benign breast biopsy: A longitudinal, comparative study [J].
Andrykowski, MA ;
Carpenter, JS ;
Studts, JL ;
Cordova, MJ ;
Cunningham, LLC ;
Beacham, A ;
Sloan, D ;
Kenady, D ;
McGrath, P .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 21 (05) :485-494
[4]  
Arver Brita, 2004, Fam Cancer, V3, P109
[5]   Stress and genetic testing for disease risk [J].
Baum, A ;
Friedman, AL ;
Zakowski, SG .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 16 (01) :8-19
[6]   Assessment of cognitive coping styles: A closer look at situation-response inventories [J].
Bijttebier, P ;
Vertommen, H ;
Vander Steene, G .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2001, 21 (01) :85-104
[7]  
Bonadona V, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P97
[8]  
Bowen DJ, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P326
[9]   Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review [J].
Broadstock, M ;
Michie, S ;
Marteau, T .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 8 (10) :731-738
[10]   Cognitive processes underlying coping flexibility: Differentiation and integration [J].
Cheng, C ;
Cheung, MWL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2005, 73 (04) :859-886