Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation

被引:76
作者
Brimacombe, J [1 ]
Keller, C
Kurian, S
Myles, J
机构
[1] Cairns Base Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Cairns 4870, Australia
[2] Leopold Franzens Univ, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care Med, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria
关键词
complications; gastric insufflation; ventilation; positive pressure;
D O I
10.1093/bja/88.1.127
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. We studied the reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation in 30 anaesthetized, paralysed intubated patients. Methods. A 16FG gastric tube was positioned with the tip in the mid-oesophagus with the proximal end attached to an injection port with a one-way valve. Four observers participated in the study. Observers were paired and each pair studied IS patients. Each patient underwent four test sequences in random order, two by each observer. Each test sequence comprised one observer injecting different volumes of air (0.25 ml, 0.5 ml, 1 ml, 2 ml, 3 ml, 4 ml, 5 ml, 10 ml, 15 ml and 0 ml as a control) in random order whilst the second blinded observer listened with a stethoscope over the epigastrium. Each randomized volume was injected rapidly at 5 s intervals for 1 min. The number of injections required to detect air entering the stomach was recorded. The stomach was deflated between each test sequence. Results. To detect air entering the stomach with 95% confidence, 11 injections were required for 0.25 ml; 7 for 0.5 ml; 3 for 1 ml; 2 for 2 ml and 3 ml, and 1 for greater than or equal to4 mi. The mean (range) inter- and intraobserver reliability was 0.73 (0.71-0.75) and 0.76 (0.76-0.89), respectively. The incidence of false positives was 21% (25/120) and the incidence of false negatives was 10% (103/1080), making the specificity and sensitivity 79% and 91%, respectively. Conclusions. We conclude that epigastric auscultation can detect gastric insufflation of 0.25 ml air after 11 breaths and greater than or equal to4 ml air after one breath with 95% confidence. Inter- and intraobserver reliability is moderate to excellent. Epigastric auscultation should be repeated to reduce the risk of false positives.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 129
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   RELIABILITY OF AUSCULTATION IN POSITIONING OF DOUBLE-LUMEN ENDOBRONCHIAL TUBES [J].
ALLIAUME, B ;
CODDENS, J ;
DELOOF, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1992, 39 (07) :687-690
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, The design and analysis of clinical experiments
[3]   Cricoid pressure [J].
Brimacombe, JR ;
Berry, AM .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1997, 44 (04) :414-425
[4]   Interrater reliability of auscultation of breath sounds among physical therapists [J].
Brooks, D ;
Thomas, J .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1995, 75 (12) :1082-1088
[5]   Comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients [J].
Keller, C ;
Brimacombe, JR ;
Keller, K ;
Morris, R .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 (02) :286-287
[6]   INFLATION PRESSURE, GASTRIC INSUFFLATION AND RAPID SEQUENCE INDUCTION [J].
LAWES, EG ;
CAMPBELL, I ;
MERCER, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 59 (03) :315-318
[7]  
ROSNER B, 1995, FUNDAMENTALS BIOSTAT, P423
[8]  
SACHS L, 1992, ANGEW STAT, P426
[9]   Survey of laryngeal mask airway usage in 11,910 patients: Safety and efficacy for conventional and nonconventional usage [J].
Verghese, C ;
Brimacombe, JR .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (01) :129-133
[10]   LARYNGEAL MASK AND GASTRIC DILATATION [J].
WITTMANN, PH ;
WITTMANN, FW .
ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 46 (12) :1083-1083