Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differentiation of benign and malignant pancreatic masses: a systemic review and meta-analysis

被引:26
作者
Xu, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Jian [1 ]
Li, Xiang [1 ]
Zeng, Xin [1 ]
Lin, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Changzheng Hosp, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Med Univ, Spine Tumor Ctr, Changzheng Hosp, Shanghai 200003, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
diagnosis; differentiation; endoscopic ultrasound elastography; pancreatic mass; FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; EUS-GUIDED FNA; DIAGNOSIS; CANCER; BIOPSY; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY;
D O I
10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835a7f7c
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography is a novel method for visualization of tissue elasticity modulus during a conventional EUS examination. The reported yield of EUS elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant pancreatic masses has shown variable results. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of EUS elastography by pooling data of available trials. Methods The Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Trials databases were used to retrieve all the studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of EUS elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant pancreatic masses. Pooling was carried out using a fixed-effect model when significant heterogeneity was not present; otherwise, the random-effect model was used. If there were less than four studies using the same diagnostic standard, forest plots were constructed without pooling. Results In six studies using the qualitative color pattern as the diagnostic standard, the sensitivity was 99% (95% confidence interval 98-100%) and the specificity was 74% (95% confidence interval 65-82%). The area under the curve under the summary receiver-operating characteristic was 0.9624. In three studies using the quantitative hue histogram value as the diagnostic standard, the sensitivity was 85-93% and the specificity was 64-76%. Conclusion EUS elastography is a promising noninvasive technique for the differentiation of pancreatic masses with a high sensitivity, and may prove to be a valuable complementary method to EUS-FNA. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25:218-224 (C) 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2013, 25:218-224
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 224
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]
Ardengh JC, 2007, J PANCREAS, V8, P413
[2]
OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[3]
Brand B, 2000, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V35, P1221
[4]
Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma?: A nationwide study re-evaluating the data of the Finnish Cancer Registry [J].
Carpelan-Holmström, M ;
Nordling, S ;
Pukkala, E ;
Sankila, R ;
Lüttges, J ;
Klöppel, G ;
Haglund, C .
GUT, 2005, 54 (03) :385-387
[5]
CANCER OF THE PANCREAS [J].
CARTER, DC .
GUT, 1990, 31 (05) :494-496
[6]
PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASE [J].
COHEN, JR ;
KUCHTA, N ;
GELLER, N ;
SHIRES, GT ;
DINEEN, P .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1983, 197 (01) :68-71
[7]
METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[8]
Utility of a repeated EUS at a tertiary-referral center [J].
DeWitt, John ;
McGreevy, Kathleen ;
Sherman, Stuart ;
LeBlanc, Julia .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (04) :610-619
[9]
Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: A meta-analysis [J].
Friedrich-Rust, Mireen ;
Ong, Mei-Fang ;
Martens, Swantje ;
Sarrazin, Christoph ;
Bojunga, Joerg ;
Zeuzem, Stefan ;
Herrmann, Eva .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 134 (04) :960-974
[10]
Misdiagnosis of Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Caution to Clinicians [J].
Gardner, Timothy B. ;
Levy, Michael J. ;
Takahashi, Naoki ;
Smyrk, Thomas C. ;
Chari, Suresh T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 104 (07) :1620-1623