Laboratory compaction of soils using a small mold procedure

被引:12
作者
Díaz-Zorita, M
Grove, JH
Perfect, E
机构
[1] EEA INTA Gen Villegas, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Agron, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Geol Sci, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2001.1593
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 [农业资源与环境]; 090301 [土壤学];
摘要
The compactability of a soil can be determined from parameters derived from laboratory compaction curves generated using the Proctor test. However, this is a destructive, time-consuming, and labor-expensive procedure. Our objective was to evaluate a new more rapid test to determine the maximum dry bulk density (p(b)(Max)) and soil water content at p(b)(Max) (SWCMax) from laboratory compaction curves using a mold with smaller dimensions than established for the standard procedure. Laboratory compaction curves were developed for nine soils with clay contents ranging from 232 to 385 g kg(-1) using the standard Proctor test procedure and the proposed procedure, which uses a 54-mm diam. mold and a 24.4 N rammer dropped from a height of 305 mm to produce a compactive effort (CE) of 109 kJ m(-3) drop(-1). At a CE of 545 kJ m(-3), which is similar to the 540 kJ m(-3) produced by the standard test, the p(b)(Max) and SWCMax parameters derived from the proposed procedure were positively and significantly correlated with those derived from the standard Proctor test. With both procedures, pbl decreased and SWCMax increased as the soil clay content increased. The small mold method did not affect the linear relationship between soil clay content and p(b)(Max). However, different relationships between SWCMax and clay content were observed, depending on the compaction procedure. Use of the small mold procedure requires less dry sieved soil, saves time, and labor in evaluating soil compactability. Based only on the reduction in rammer drops, use of the small mold procedure involves 15 times less labor requirements than the standard Proctor test.
引用
收藏
页码:1593 / 1598
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]
*AM SOC TEST MAT, 2000, AM SOC TEST MAT ASTM, P1
[2]
[Anonymous], 2002, SSSA Book Series, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.1.2ED.C15
[3]
[Anonymous], 1983, Statistical methods
[4]
[Anonymous], 2000, STATISTIX7 USERS MAN
[5]
Maximum compactibility of Argentine soils from the Proctor test;: The relationship with organic carbon and water content [J].
Aragón, A ;
García, MG ;
Filgueira, RR ;
Pachepsky, YA .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2000, 56 (3-4) :197-204
[6]
Soil compactibility in relation to physical and organic properties at 156 sites in UK [J].
Ball, BC ;
Campbell, DJ ;
Hunter, EA .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2000, 57 (1-2) :83-91
[7]
Effectiveness of sugarcane residue incorporation at different water contents and the Proctor compaction loads in reducing soil compactibility [J].
Barzegar, AR ;
Asoodar, MA ;
Ansari, M .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2000, 57 (03) :167-172
[8]
Boone F.R., 1994, SOIL COMPACTION CROP, P237, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-88286-8.50019-2
[9]
Burke W., 1986, Soil structure assessment