Comparison of BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial

被引:477
作者
Heller, John G. [1 ]
Sasso, Rick C. [2 ]
Papadopoulos, Stephen M. [3 ]
Anderson, Paul A. [4 ]
Fessler, Richard G. [5 ]
Hacker, Robert J.
Coric, Domagoj [6 ]
Cauthen, Joseph C. [7 ]
Riew, Daniel K. [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Emory Spine Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, IN Spine Grp, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Barrow Neurosurg Associates, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin Hosp, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Neurosurg Sect, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Carolina Neurosurg & Spine Associates, Charlotte, NC USA
[7] Neurosurg & Spine Associates, Gainesville, FL USA
[8] Barnes Jewish Hosp, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[9] Washington Univ Orthoped, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
degenerative disc disease; cervical spine; arthroplasty; fusion; spinal instrumentation; INTERMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP; RELIABILITY; SITE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee263
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study of surgical treatment of cervical disc disease. Objective. To assess the safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty using a new arthroplasty device at 24-months follow-up. Summary of Background Data. Cervical disc arthroplasty preserves motion in the cervical spine. It is an alternative to fusion after neurologic decompression, whereas anterior decompression and fusion provides a rigorous comparative benchmark of success. Methods. We conducted a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial enrolling patients with cervical disc disease. Ultimately 242 received the investigational device (Bryan Cervical Disc), and 221 patients underwent a single-level anterior cervical discectomy and decompression and fusion as a control group. Patients completed clinical and radiographic follow-up examinations at regular intervals for 2 years after surgery. Results. Analysis of 12- and 24-month postoperative data showed improvement in all clinical outcome measures for both groups; however, 24 months after surgery, the investigational group patients treated with the artificial disc had a statistically greater improvement in the primary outcome variables: Neck disability index score (P = 0.025) and overall success (P = 0.010). With regard to implant-or implant/surgical-procedure-associated serious adverse events, the investigational group had a rate of 1.7% and the control group, 3.2%. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups with regard to the rate of secondary surgical procedures performed subsequent to the index procedure. Patients who received the artificial cervical disc returned to work nearly 2 weeks earlier than the fusion patients (P = 0.015). Conclusion. Two-year follow-up results indicate that cervical disc arthroplasty is a viable alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with persistently symptomatic, single-level cervical disc disease.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Wear analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis [J].
Anderson, PA ;
Rouleau, JP ;
Bryan, VE ;
Carlson, CS .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (20) :S186-S194
[2]
[Anonymous], 2004, SPINE J, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.SPINEE.2004.07.026
[3]
Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan Cervical Disc: early clinical results from a single investigational site - Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2005 [J].
Coric, D ;
Finger, F ;
Boltes, P .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 4 (01) :31-35
[4]
DUGGAL N, 2004, NEUROSURG FOCUS, pE9
[5]
Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine [J].
Goffin, J ;
Geusens, E ;
Vantomme, N ;
Quintens, E ;
Waerzeggers, Y ;
Depreitere, B ;
Van Calenbergh, F ;
van Loon, J .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2004, 17 (02) :79-85
[6]
Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis [J].
Goffin, J ;
Casey, A ;
Kehr, P ;
Liebig, K ;
Lind, B ;
Logroscino, C ;
Pointillart, V ;
Van Calenbergh, F ;
van Loon, J .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (03) :840-845
[7]
Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: Single-level and bi-level [J].
Goffin, J ;
Van Calenbergh, F ;
van Loon, J ;
Casey, A ;
Kehr, P ;
Liebig, K ;
Lind, B ;
Logroscino, C ;
Sgrambiglia, R ;
Pointillart, V .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (24) :2673-2678
[8]
Goffin JJ, 2006, SPINE J, V6, p62S, DOI [10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.159, DOI 10.1016/J.SPINEE.2006.06.159]
[9]
Cervical disc arthroplasty: a controlled randomized prospective study with intermediate follow-up results [J].
Hacker, RJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2005, 3 (06) :424-428
[10]
Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis [J].
Hilibrand, AS ;
Carlson, GD ;
Palumbo, MA ;
Jones, PK ;
Bohlman, HH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1999, 81A (04) :519-528