Probiotics Reduce Mortality and Morbidity in Preterm, Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

被引:147
作者
Morgan, Rebecca L. [1 ]
Preidis, Geoffrey A. [2 ,3 ]
Kashyap, Purna C. [4 ]
Weizman, Adam, V [5 ]
Sadeghirad, Behnam [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Sect Gastroenterol Hepatol & Nutr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Texas Childrens Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Enter Neurosci Program, Rochester, MN USA
[5] Univ Toronto, Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Anesthesia, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[7] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Inst Pain Res & Care, 1280 Main St West,MDCL 2112, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
Commensal; Microbiota; Supplement; Newborn; LATE-ONSET SEPSIS; NEONATAL NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; REUTERI DSM 17938; BIFIDOBACTERIUM-BREVE; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREMATURE-INFANTS; PROPHYLACTIC PROBIOTICS; LACTOBACILLUS-REUTERI; ORAL SUPPLEMENTATION; FEEDING TOLERANCE;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2020.05.096
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of single- vs multiple-strain probiotics in a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, BIOSIS Previews, and Google Scholar through January 1, 2019, for studies of single-strain and multistrain probiotic formulations on the outcomes of preterm, low-birth-weight neonates. We used a frequentist approach for network meta-analysis and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, severe necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (Bell stage II or more), and culture-proven sepsis. RESULTS: We analyzed data from 63 trials involving 15,712 preterm infants. Compared with placebo, a combination of 1 or more Lactobacillus species (spp) and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp was the only intervention with moderate- or high-quality evidence of reduced all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.80). Among interventions with moderate- or high-quality evidence for efficacy compared with placebo, combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp, Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis, Lactobacillus reuteri, or Lactobacillus rhamnosus significantly reduced severe NEC (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.20-0.59]; OR, 0.31 [95% CI, 0.13-0.74]; OR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.91]; and OR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.21-0.90], respectively). There was moderate-or high-quality evidence that combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp and Saccharomyces boulardii reduced the number of days to reach full feeding (mean reduction of 3.30 days [95% CI, reduction of 5.91-0.69 days]). There was moderate- or high-quality evidence that, compared with placebo, the single-species product B animalis subsp lactis or L reuteri significantly reduced duration of hospitalization (mean reduction of 13.00 days [95% CI, reduction of 22.71-3.29 days] and mean reduction of 7.89 days [95% CI, reduction of 11.60-4.17 days], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review and network meta-analysis of studies to determine the effects of single-strain and multistrain probiotic formulations on outcomes of preterm, low-birth-weight neonates, we found moderate to high evidence for the superiority of combinations of 1 or more Lactobacillus spp and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp vs single- and other multiple-strain probiotic treatments. The combinations of Bacillus spp and Enterococcus spp, and 1 or more Bifidobacterium spp and Streptococcus salivarius subsp thermophilus, might produce the largest reduction in NEC development. Further trials are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 480
页数:14
相关论文
共 105 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, PLOS ONE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, MMWR MORBID MORTAL S
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, STAT MED, DOI DOI 10.1002/SIM.2380
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, ACTA PAEDIATR, DOI DOI 10.1111/APA.14497
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, NUTRIENTS, DOI DOI 10.3390/NU9090965
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2014, PEDIATR INT, DOI DOI 10.1111/PED.12330
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2015, BMJ OPEN
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2018, JPEN PARENTER ENTER, DOI DOI 10.1177/0148607117722749
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2008, BRIT MED J
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2013, INTENS CARE MED S1