An easy mathematical proof showed that time-dependent bias inevitably leads to biased effect estimation

被引:136
作者
Beyersmann, Jan [1 ,2 ]
Gastmeier, Petra [3 ,4 ]
Wolkewitz, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Schumacher, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Freiburg Ctr Data Anal & Modelling, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Inst Med Biometry & Med Informat, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Med Microbiol, Hannover, Germany
[4] Hannover Med Sch, Hosp Epidemiol, Hannover, Germany
关键词
Survival bias; Length bias; Time-dependent exposure; Mathematical proof; Hospital infection; Survival analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.008
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Time-dependent bias occurs when future exposure status is analyzed as being known with start of observation. As this bias is common, we sought to determine whether it always leads to biased effect estimation. We also sought to determine the direction of the effect bias. Study Design and Setting: We derived an easy mathematical proof investigating the nature of time-dependent bias. We applied the general mathematical result to data from a prospective cohort study on the incidence of hospital infection in intensive care: Here, we investigated the effect of time-dependent hospital infection status on intensive care unit stay. The nature of time-dependent bias was also illustrated graphically. Results: Biased effect estimation is a mathematically inevitable consequence of time-dependent bias, because the number of individuals at risk of exposure is distorted over the course of time. In case of a time-dependent exposure that prolongs time until the study endpoint, the prolonging effect will be overestimated. Conclusion: Because time-dependent bias inevitably leads to erroneous findings, it is a major concern that it is common in the clinical literature. Time-dependent bias can be avoided by proper hazard-based analyses. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1216 / 1221
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Andersen P. K., 1993, STAT MODELS BASED CO, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4612-4348-9, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4612-4348-9_4]
[2]  
Andersen PK, 2002, STAT METHODS MED RES, V11, P91, DOI 10.1191/0962280202SM276ra
[3]   ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL BY TUMOR RESPONSE [J].
ANDERSON, JR ;
CAIN, KC ;
GELBER, RD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 1 (11) :710-719
[4]  
ANDERSON JR, 1985, CANCER TREAT REP, V69, P1139
[5]   Quantifying the impact of survivor treatment bias in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Mamdani, Muhammad M. ;
van Walraven, Carl ;
Tu, Jack V. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 12 (06) :601-612
[6]   ANALYZING THE SAME DATA IN 2 WAYS - A DEMONSTRATION MODEL TO ILLUSTRATE THE REPORTING AND MISREPORTING OF CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BAAR, J ;
TANNOCK, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (07) :969-978
[7]   Use of multistate models to assess prolongation of intensive care unit stay due to nosocomial infection [J].
Beyersmann, J. ;
Gastmeier, P. ;
Grundmann, H. ;
Baerwolff, S. ;
Geffers, C. ;
Behnke, M. ;
Rueden, H. ;
Schumacher, M. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (05) :493-499
[8]   Transmission-associated nosocomial infections:: Prolongation of intensive care unit stay and risk factor analysis using multistate models [J].
Beyersmann, Jan ;
Gastmeier, Petra ;
Grundmann, Hajo ;
Baerwolff, Sina ;
Geffers, Christine ;
Behnke, Martin ;
Rueden, Henning ;
Schumacher, Martin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2008, 36 (02) :98-103
[9]   A random time interval approach for analysing the impact of a possible intermediate event on a terminal event [J].
Beyersmann, Jan .
BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 49 (05) :742-749
[10]  
Beyersmann J, 2006, AM STAT, V60, P295