Comparative study of the ThinPrep Pap test and conventional cytology results in a Canadian cohort

被引:13
作者
Duggan, MA
Khalil, M
Brasher, PMA
Nation, JG
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Alberta Canc Board, Div Epidemiol Prevent & Screening, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
ThinPrep Pap test; conventional Pap test; comparison study; clinical follow-up;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00340.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the frequency of Pap test results in a prospective series of direct to vial ThinPrep tests to a cohort of conventionally prepared tests. To follow-up all test results for a minimum of 2 years and assess performance based on this outcome. Methods: All women presenting for either routine screening or colposcopic examination in 2001 were enrolled in the ThinPrep cohort. A similar, population of conventionally prepared tests was extracted from the year 2000 laboratory data. Information on all concurrent and follow-up cervical specimens over the ensuing 2 years was retrieved. Results: The ThinPrep cohort comprised 2288 Pap tests and the conventional, 2211. The frequency of normal [within normal limits (WNL) and benign cellular changes (BCC)] results in the ThinPrep cohort was 6% lower and the frequency of abnormal [>= atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS)] results was 6.8% higher. Respective ThinPrep and conventional cohort results were 1156 (51%) and 1291 (58%) WNL, 625 (27%) and 561 (25%) BCC, 101 (4%) and 65 (3%) ASCUS, 21 (1%) and 2 (0.1%) atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance, 301 (13%) and 224 (10%) low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), and 74 (3%) and 40 (2%) high-grade SIL (HSIL) (P < 0.0001). Follow-up was available for nearly 80% of each cohort. LSIL or higher was confirmed in 57.5% (n = 266) of the abnormal ThinPrep and 60.9% (n = 190) of the abnormal conventional tests. The ThinPrep yield of confirmed tests however was almost 50% higher than the conventional test. Conclusion: In this population, ThinPrep was superior to the conventional Pap test.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*ALB CANC REG, 2004, CANC ALB REG PICT
[2]  
*ALB MED ASS, 2002, GUID SCREEN CERV CAN
[3]  
[Anonymous], LIQ BAS CYT CERV SCR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 40 CAN COORD OFF HLT
[5]  
AUGER M, 2001, ACTA CYTOL, V45, P816
[6]  
Benoit J. L., 2000, Pathology International, V50, pA53
[7]   Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: A metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy [J].
Bernstein, SJ ;
Sanchez-Ramos, L ;
Ndubisi, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (02) :308-315
[8]   Laboratory implementation and efficacy assessment of the ThinPrep cervical cancer screening system [J].
Bolick, DR ;
Hellman, DJ .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1998, 42 (01) :209-213
[9]  
BROADSTOCK M, 2000, NZHTA REPORT, V3
[10]  
Corkill M, 1998, J Low Genit Tract Dis, V2, P12, DOI 10.1097/00128360-199801000-00003