Proficiency test for screening mammography: results for 117 volunteer Italian radiologists

被引:22
作者
Ciatto, S
Ambrogetti, D
Catarzi, S
Morrone, D
Del Turco, MR
机构
[1] Ctr Studio & Prevenz Oncol, Dept Diagnost Imaging, I-50131 Florence, Italy
[2] Ctr Studio & Prevenz Oncol, Breast Unit, I-50131 Florence, Italy
关键词
breast cancer; mammography; quality control; training; proficiency test;
D O I
10.1136/jms.6.3.149
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective-To analyse the performance of a large sample of Italian radiologists undergoing a proficiency test for screening mammography. Design-Evaluation of performance indicators according to reference standards determined by a panel of experts (sensitivity (reference standard greater than or equal to 80%), recall rate (reference standard less than or equal to 15%)). Setting-117 Italian radiologists of varying experience (years of practice 0.5-18, average 5.9; mammograms read 500-51 000, average 13 000), all currently reporting clinical mammography and planning to take part in screening in the near future. Results-Eighty four of 117 (72%) radiologists reached the standard for sensitivity, 88 (75%) reached the standard for recall rate, and only 59 (50%) reached both standards and passed the proficiency test. The probability of passing the test was significantly correlated with mammographic practice (p=0.015), mammograms read (p=0.024), and mammograms read/year (p=0.043). Discussion-The performance of a large sample of Italian radiologists currently reporting clinical mammography was disappointing, indicating the need for proper training of at least 50% of the tested subjects. When implementing organised screening the health authority should set up a proper process far training and accrediting radiologists, and a proficiency test should be part of such a process.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 151
页数:3
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   THE ROLE OF THE REFERENCE RADIOLOGIST - ESTIMATES OF INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT AND POTENTIAL DELAY IN CANCER-DETECTION IN THE NATIONAL BREAST SCREENING STUDY [J].
BAINES, CJ ;
MCFARLANE, DV ;
MILLER, AB .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (09) :971-976
[2]   THE DETECTABILITY OF BREAST-CANCER BY SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
CIATTO, S ;
DELTURCO, MR ;
ZAPPA, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 71 (02) :337-339
[3]   INTEROBSERVER AND INTRAOBSERVER VARIABILITY OF MAMMOGRAM INTERPRETATION - A FIELD-STUDY [J].
CICCONE, G ;
VINEIS, P ;
FRIGERIO, A ;
SEGNAN, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 28A (6-7) :1054-1058
[4]  
de Wolf CJ, 1996, EUROPEAN GUIDELINES
[5]   VARIABILITY IN RADIOLOGISTS INTERPRETATIONS OF MAMMOGRAMS [J].
ELMORE, JG ;
WELLS, CK ;
LEE, CH ;
HOWARD, DH ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (22) :1493-1499
[6]   A CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF A NONRANDOMIZED BREAST-CANCER SCREENING-PROGRAM IN FLORENCE (ITALY) [J].
PALLI, D ;
DELTURCO, MR ;
BUIATTI, E ;
CARLI, S ;
CIATTO, S ;
TOSCANI, L ;
MALTONI, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1986, 38 (04) :501-504
[7]  
Schmidt F, 1998, CANCER, V83, P2516, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19981215)83:12<2516::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-#
[9]   INTER-OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE INTERPRETATION OF MAMMOGRAMS [J].
VINEIS, P ;
SINISTRERO, G ;
TEMPORELLI, A ;
AZZONI, L ;
BIGO, A ;
BURKE, P ;
CICCONE, G ;
FASCIANO, F ;
FERRARIS, R ;
FRIGERIO, A ;
GENOVESE, MG ;
LUPARIA, E ;
POTENZONI, F ;
SEGNAN, N .
TUMORI, 1988, 74 (03) :275-279