Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

被引:295
作者
DeJesus, Edwin [2 ]
Rockstroh, Juergen K. [3 ]
Henry, Keith [4 ]
Molina, Jean-Michel [5 ,6 ]
Gathe, Joseph [7 ]
Ramanathan, Srinivasan [1 ]
Wei, Xuelian [1 ]
Yale, Kitty [1 ]
Szwarcberg, Javier [1 ]
White, Kirsten [1 ]
Cheng, Andrew K. [1 ]
Kearney, Brian P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gilead Sci, Foster City, CA 94110 USA
[2] Orlando Immunol Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Univ Bonn, Dept Med, Bonn, Germany
[4] Hennepin Cty Med Ctr, Minneapolis, MN 55415 USA
[5] Hop St Louis, AP HP, Paris Sorbonne Cite, France
[6] Univ Paris Diderot, Paris Sorbonne Cite, France
[7] Therapeut Concepts, Houston, TX USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PATIENTS 96-WEEK EFFICACY; SINGLE-TABLET REGIMEN; TREATMENT-NAIVE; EFAVIRENZ; SAFETY; COMBINATION; ADULTS; PHARMACOKINETICS; RALTEGRAVIR; ADHERENCE;
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60918-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor elvitegravir (EVG) has been co-formulated with the CYP3A4 inhibitor cobicistat (COBI), emtricitabine (FTC), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) into a once-daily, single tablet. We compared EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF with a ritonavir-boosted (RTV) protease inhibitor regimen of atazanavir (ATV)/RTV+FTC/TDF as initial therapy for HIV-1 infection. Methods This phase 3, non-inferiority study enrolled treatment-naive patients with an HIV-1 RNA concentration of 5000 copies per mL or more and susceptibility to atazanavir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir. Patients were randomly assigned (1: 1) to receive EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF or ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF plus matching placebos, administered once daily. Randomisation was by a computer-generated random sequence, accessed via an interactive telephone and web response system. Patients, and investigators and study staff who gave treatments, assessed outcomes, or analysed data were masked to the assignment. The primary endpoint was HIV RNA concentration of 50 copies per mL or less after 48 weeks (according to the US FDA snapshot algorithm), with a 12% non-inferiority margin. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01106586. Findings 1017 patients were screened, 715 were enrolled, and 708 were treated (353 with EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF and 355 with ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF). EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF was non-inferior to ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF for the primary outcome (316 patients [89.5%] vs 308 patients [86.8%], adjusted difference 3.0%, 95% CI -1.9% to 7.8%). Both regimens had favourable safety and tolerability; 13 (3.7%) versus 18 (5.1%) patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. Fewer patients receiving EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF had abnormal results in liver function tests than did those receiving ATV/RTV+FTC/TDF and had smaller median increases in fasting triglyceride concentration (90 mu mol/L vs 260 mu mol/L, p=0.006). Small median increases in serum creatinine concentration with accompanying decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate occurred in both study groups by week 2; they generally stabilised by week 8 and did not change up to week 48 (median change 11 mu mol/L vs 7 mu mol/L). Interpretation If regulatory approval is given, EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF would be the first integrase-inhibitor-based regimen given once daily and the only one formulated as a single tablet for initial HIV treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:2429 / 2438
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] Airoldi M, 2010, PATIENT PREFER ADHER, V4, P115
  • [2] [Anonymous], 51 INT C ANT AG CHEM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, GUIDELINES USE ANTIR, P1
  • [4] A single tablet regimen is associated with higher adherence and viral suppression than multiple tablet regimens in HIV plus homeless and marginally housed people
    Bangsberg, David R.
    Ragland, Kathleen
    Monk, Alex
    Deeks, Steven G.
    [J]. AIDS, 2010, 24 (18) : 2835 - 2840
  • [5] Branson Bernard M., 2006, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, V55, P1
  • [6] The safety and efficacy of tenofovir DF in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz through 6 years in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients
    Cassetti, Isabel
    Madruga, Jose Valdez R.
    Suleiman, Jamal Muhamad A. H.
    Etzel, Arnaldo
    Zhong, Lijie
    Cheng, Andrew K.
    Enejosa, Jeffrey
    [J]. HIV CLINICAL TRIALS, 2007, 8 (03): : 164 - 172
  • [7] Factors affecting adherence to antiretroviral therapy
    Chesney, MA
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 30 : S171 - S176
  • [8] Randomized, phase 2 evaluation of two single-tablet regimens elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the initial treatment of HIV infection
    Cohen, Calvin
    Elion, Richard
    Ruane, Peter
    Shamblaw, David
    DeJesus, Edwin
    Rashbaum, Bruce
    Chuck, Steven L.
    Yale, Kitty
    Liu, Hui C.
    Warren, David R.
    Ramanathan, Srinivasan
    Kearney, Brian P.
    [J]. AIDS, 2011, 25 (06) : F7 - F12
  • [9] Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial
    Cohen, Calvin J.
    Andrade-Villanueva, Jaime
    Clotet, Bonaventura
    Fourie, Jan
    Johnson, Margaret A.
    Ruxrungtham, Kiat
    Wu, Hao
    Zorrilla, Carmen
    Crauwels, Herta
    Rimsky, Laurence T.
    Vanveggel, Simon
    Boven, Katia
    [J]. LANCET, 2011, 378 (9787) : 229 - 237
  • [10] Daar E, 2010, 17 C RETR OPP INF CR