Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry

被引:1391
作者
Peters, Jaime L. [1 ]
Sutton, Alex J. [1 ]
Jones, David R. [1 ]
Abrams, Keith R. [1 ]
Rushton, Lesley [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leicester, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester LE1 7RH, Leics, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
publication bias; funnel plots; statistical significance; contours; meta-analysis; asymmetry;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To present the contour-enhanced funnel plot as an aid to differentiating asymmetry due to publication bias from that due to other factors. Study Design and Setting: An enhancement to the usual funnel plot is proposed that allows the statistical significance of study estimates to be considered. Contour lines indicating conventional milestones in levels of statistical significance (e.g., < 0.01, < 0.05, < 0.1) are added to funnel plots. Results: This contour overlay aids the interpretation of the funnel plot. For example, if studies appear to be missing in areas of statistical nonsignificance, then this adds credence to the possibility that the asymmetry is due to publication bias. Conversely, if the supposed missing studies are in areas of higher statistical significance, this would suggest the cause of the asymmetry may be more likely to be due to factors other than publication bias, such as variable study quality. Conclusions: We believe this enhancement to funnel plots (i) is simple to implement, (ii) is widely applicable, (iii) greatly improves interpretability, and (iv) should be used routinely. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 996
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Methods for Meta-Analysis in Medical Research
[2]  
Begg C.B., 1994, HDB RES SYNTHESIS, P399
[3]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[4]   Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials -: Comparison of Protocols to published articles [J].
Chan, AW ;
Hróbjartsson, A ;
Haahr, MT ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Altman, DG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (20) :2457-2465
[5]   Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors [J].
Chan, AW ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7494) :753-756
[6]   What works?: selectivity models and meta-analysis [J].
Copas, J .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1999, 162 :95-109
[7]  
Dickersin K, 1997, AIDS EDUC PREV, V9, P15
[8]   A nonparametric "trim and fill" method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (449) :89-98
[9]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463
[10]   PUBLICATION BIAS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH [J].
EASTERBROOK, PJ ;
BERLIN, JA ;
GOPALAN, R ;
MATTHEWS, DR .
LANCET, 1991, 337 (8746) :867-872