Common fallacies in estimation and control under uncertainty

被引:2
作者
Agarwal, M
机构
[1] TCL, Eidgenössische TH
关键词
objective functions; optimal methods; worst-case design;
D O I
10.1016/0959-1524(96)00004-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Examples from the literature are used to illustrate certain common fallacies in the development of estimators and controllers under uncertainty. It is shown that the common notions of process, model, objective, and method must carefully be distinguished from one another and from additional concepts of attitude and best strategy. Failure to do so can readily lead to false claims and sub-optimal, or even useless, schemes. Concrete guidelines are provided to avoid the fallacies and to better focus the research effort.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 307
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
AGARWAL M, 1993, P EUR CONTR C GRON N, P2313
[2]  
AGARWAL M, 1994, P 5 INT S PROC ENG P, P1181
[3]   STOCHASTIC AND WORST-CASE SYSTEM-IDENTIFICATION ARE NOT NECESSARILY INCOMPATIBLE [J].
BAI, EW ;
ANDERSLAND, MS .
AUTOMATICA, 1994, 30 (09) :1491-1493
[4]   MINIMUM-SENSITIVITY FILTER FOR LINEAR TIME-INVARIANT STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS WITH UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS [J].
CHUNG, RC ;
BELANGER, PR .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1976, 21 (01) :98-100
[5]   MINIMAX APPROACH TO DESIGN OF LOW SENSITIVITY STATE ESTIMATORS [J].
DAPPOLITO, JA ;
HUTCHINSON, CE .
AUTOMATICA, 1972, 8 (05) :599-+
[6]  
DESOUZA CE, 1992, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 31ST IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-4, P2305, DOI 10.1109/CDC.1992.371380
[7]   A 4-BLOCK PROBLEM FOR H-INFINITY DESIGN - PROPERTIES AND APPLICATIONS [J].
ENGLEHART, MJ ;
SMITH, MC .
AUTOMATICA, 1991, 27 (05) :811-818
[8]   WHEN IS ADAPTIVE BETTER THAN OPTIMAL [J].
FUCHS, JJ ;
DELYON, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1993, 38 (11) :1700-1703
[9]  
Goodwin G.C., 1994, ADAPTIVE FILTERING P
[10]  
Gusev S. V., 1995, Proceedings of the Third European Control Conference. ECC 95, P2591