Short-term comparison of once- versus twice-daily administration of glimepiride in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

被引:35
作者
Sonnenberg, GE
Garg, DC
Weidler, DJ
Dixon, RM
Jaber, LA
Bowen, AJ
DeCherney, GS
Mullican, WS
Stonesifer, LD
机构
[1] BESSELAT CLIN RES UNIT, W PALM BEACH, FL USA
[2] UNIV MIAMI, SCH MED, MIAMI, FL USA
[3] BESSELAR CLIN RES, MADISON, WI USA
[4] WAYNE STATE UNIV, COLL PHARM & ALLIED HLTH PROFESS, DETROIT, MI 48202 USA
[5] MIDDLETON FDN INC, OLYMPIA, WA USA
[6] MED CTR DELAWARE, DIV METAB DIS, NEWARK, DE USA
[7] MED CTR DELAWARE, CLIN PHARMACOL RES INST, NEWARK, DE USA
[8] GFI PHARMACEUT SERV INC, EVANSVILLE, IN USA
[9] ST FRANCIS HOSP, DIABET EDU PROGRAMS, FEDERAL WAY, WA USA
关键词
glimepiride; diabetes mellitus;
D O I
10.1177/106002809703100601
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the metabolic effects and frequency of adverse events with 6 mg of glimepiride, a new oral sulfonylurea, given both in once- and twice-daily dosages to patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This 15-week study involved 161 subjects with NIDDM. Subjects were randomized into two groups. For 4 weeks, group 1 received glimepiride 3 mg twice daily, and group 2 received glimepiride 6 mg once daily. After a 3-week placebo-washout period, twice- and once-daily regimens were crossed over for a second 4-week treatment period. Subjects were hospitalized at the end of each placebo or active-treatment phase. Their glucose concentrations were recorded at 20 time points over a 24-hour period, and their insulin and C-peptide concentrations were recorded at 16 time points over the same period. Parameters that were calculated included fasting, 24-hour, and postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin, and C-peptide. RESULTS: One hundred six patients were randomized to receive treatment; 94 completed the entire study. Existing physiologic mechanisms of glucose control were apparently unimpaired by glimepiride treatment. Insulin concentrations increased more during the postprandial glucose peaks than when subjects were fasting. Both twice- and once-daily regimens proved equally effective in reducing concentrations of fasting, postbreakfast, postlunch, and postdinner plasma glucose. Twenty-four-hour mean glucose concentrations showed a slightly greater decrease from baseline for the twice-daily regimen; the difference between the regimens was statistically significant but not clinically meaningful. The incidence of adverse events with glimepiride approximated that obtained with placebo, with both groups reporting only one adverse event, headache, in more than 5% of the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Glimepiride is equally effective whether administered once or twice daily. Glimepiride seems to stimulate insulin production primarily after meals, when plasma glucose concentrations are highest, but controls blood glucose throughout the day.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 676
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BALLAGIPORDANY G, 1992, ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCH, V42-1, P111
[2]   HOW OFTEN IS MEDICATION TAKEN AS PRESCRIBED - A NOVEL ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE [J].
CRAMER, JA ;
MATTSON, RH ;
PREVEY, ML ;
SCHEYER, RD ;
OUELLETTE, VL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1989, 261 (22) :3273-3277
[3]   CLINICAL PROFILE OF GLIMEPIRIDE [J].
DRAEGER, E .
DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 1995, 28 :S139-S146
[4]   A dose-response study of glimepiride in patients with NIDDM who have previously received sulfonylurea agents [J].
Goldberg, RB ;
Holvey, SM ;
Schneider, J ;
Bansal, S ;
Blonde, L ;
Boden, G ;
Bransome, ED ;
Clark, C ;
Clarke, D ;
Davis, M ;
Davis, S ;
Gerich, J ;
Goldberg, R ;
Haag, B ;
Hendler, R ;
Josse, RG ;
JovanovicPeterson, L ;
Karam, JH ;
Kennedy, F ;
Kilo, C ;
Klachko, D ;
Knopf, RF ;
Kolterman, O ;
Krosnick, A ;
Leiter, LA ;
Leslie, C ;
Malone, JK ;
Meenan, A ;
Metzger, B ;
Morrison, AD ;
Raskin, P ;
Reeves, M ;
Rendell, M ;
Saudek, C ;
Schwartz, S ;
Skor, D ;
Tung, PC .
DIABETES CARE, 1996, 19 (08) :849-856
[5]   RADIOIMMUNOLOGICAL DETERMINATION OF HUMAN C-PEPTIDE IN SERUM [J].
HEDING, LG .
DIABETOLOGIA, 1975, 11 (06) :541-548
[6]   COMPARISON OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM GLYBURIDE THERAPY IN NIDDM [J].
JABER, LA ;
ANTAL, EJ ;
SLAUGHTER, RL ;
WELSHMAN, IR .
DIABETES CARE, 1994, 17 (11) :1300-1306
[7]   DIFFERENTIAL INTERACTION OF GLIMEPIRIDE AND GLIBENCLAMIDE WITH THE BETA-CELL SULFONYLUREA RECEPTOR .2. PHOTOAFFINITY-LABELING OF A 65 KDA PROTEIN BY [H-3] GLIMEPIRIDE [J].
KRAMER, W ;
MULLER, G ;
GIRBIG, F ;
GUTJAHR, U ;
KOWALEWSKI, S ;
HARTZ, D ;
SUMM, HD .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES, 1994, 1191 (02) :278-290
[8]   DETERMINATION OF FREE AND TOTAL INSULIN AND C-PEPTIDE IN INSULIN-TREATED DIABETICS [J].
KUZUYA, H ;
BLIX, PM ;
HORWITZ, DL ;
STEINER, DF ;
RUBENSTEIN, AH .
DIABETES, 1977, 26 (01) :22-29
[9]   THE ATP-SENSITIVE K+ CHANNEL MEDIATES HYPOTENSION IN ENDOTOXEMIA AND HYPOXIC LACTIC-ACIDOSIS IN DOG [J].
LANDRY, DW ;
OLIVER, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1992, 89 (06) :2071-2074
[10]  
MADSBAD S, 1992, INT TXB DIABETES MEL, P303