Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean section - A dose-finding study

被引:85
作者
Khaw, KS [1 ]
Kee, WDN [1 ]
Wong, ELY [1 ]
Liu, JYW [1 ]
Chung, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200112000-00011
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The dose-response relation for spinal ropivacaine is undetermined, and there are few data available for obstetric patients. Methods: in a prospective, randomized, double-blind investigation, the authors studied 72 patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. An epidural catheter was placed at the L2-L3 vertebral interspace. Lumbar puncture was then performed at the L3-L4 vertebral interspace, and patients were randomized to receive a dose of spinal ropivacaine diluted to 3 nil with normal saline: 10 mg (n = 12), 15 mg (n = 20), 20 mg (n = 20), or 25 mg (n = 20). Sensory changes assessed by ice and pin prick and motor changes assessed by modified Bromage score were recorded at timed intervals. A dose was considered effective if an upper sensory level to pin prick of T7 or above was achieved and epidural supplementation was not required intraoperatively. Results: Anesthesia was successful in 8.3, 45, 70, and 90% of the 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-mg groups, respectively. A sigmoid dose-response curve and a probit log dose-response plot were obtained, and the authors determined the ED50 (95% confidence interval) to be 16.7 (14.1-18.8) mg and the ED,, (95% confidence interval) to be 26.8 (23.6-34.1) mg. Duration of sensory and motor block and degree of motor block, but not onset of anesthesia, were positively related to dose. Conclusions: The ED50 and estimated ED,, for spinal ropivacaine were 16.7 and 26.8 mg, respectively. Ropivacaine is a suitable agent for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:1346 / 1350
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] PRIMARY EVALUATION OF THE LOCAL-ANESTHETIC PROPERTIES OF THE AMINO AMIDE AGENT ROPIVACAINE (LEA-103)
    AKERMAN, B
    HELLBERG, IB
    TROSSVIK, C
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1988, 32 (07) : 571 - 578
  • [2] Spinal anaesthesia with 0.25% hyperbaric bupivacaine for Caesarean section: Effects of volume
    Chung, CJ
    Bae, SH
    Chao, KY
    Chin, YJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 77 (02) : 145 - 149
  • [3] DATTA S, 1965, ACTA ANAESTHESIOL S, V16, P55
  • [4] Intrathecal ropivacaine for ambulatory surgery - A comparison between intrathecal bupivacaine and intrathecal ropivacaine for knee arthroscopy
    Gautier, PE
    De Kock, M
    Van Steenberge, A
    Poth, N
    Lahaye-Goffart, B
    Fanard, L
    Hody, JL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (05) : 1239 - 1245
  • [5] Glosten B, 2000, ANESTHESIA, P2049
  • [6] Intrathecal bupivacaine in humans - Influence of volume and baricity of solutions
    Malinovsky, JM
    Renaud, G
    Le Corre, P
    Charles, F
    Lepage, JY
    Malinge, M
    Cozian, A
    Bouchot, O
    Pinaud, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 91 (05) : 1260 - 1266
  • [7] Intrathecal anesthesia: Ropivacaine versus bupivacaine
    Malinovsky, JM
    Charles, F
    Kick, O
    Lepage, JY
    Malinge, M
    Cozian, A
    Bouchot, O
    Pinaud, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (06) : 1457 - 1460
  • [8] Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine - A comparison to bupivacaine in volunteers
    McDonald, SB
    Liu, SS
    Kopacz, DJ
    Stephenson, CA
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) : 971 - 977
  • [9] Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor - Implications for therapeutic indexes
    Polley, LS
    Columb, MO
    Naughton, NN
    Wagner, DS
    van de Ven, CJM
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) : 944 - 950
  • [10] REISNER LS, 1999, ANESTHESIA CESAREAN, P475