Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: The concept of a donor risk index

被引:1527
作者
Feng, S [1 ]
Goodrich, NP
Bragg-Gresham, JL
Dykstra, DM
Punch, JD
DebRoy, MA
Greenstein, SM
Merion, RM
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Renal Res & Educ Assoc, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Sci Registry Transplant Recipients, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Newark, NJ 07103 USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Transplant physicians and candidates have become increasingly aware that donor characteristics significantly impact liver transplantation outcomes. Although the qualitative effect of individual donor variables are understood, the quantitative risk associated with combinations of characteristics are unclear. Using national data from 1998 to 2002, we developed a quantitative donor risk index. Cox regression models identified seven donor characteristics that independently predicted significantly increased risk of graft failure. Donor age over 40 years (and particularly over 60 years), donation after cardiac death (DCD), and split/partial grafts were strongly associated with graft failure, while African-American race, less height, cerebrovascular accident and 'other' causes of brain death were more modestly but still significantly associated with graft failure. Grafts with an increased donor risk index have been preferentially transplanted into older candidates (> 50 years of age) with moderate disease severity (nonstatus 1 with lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores) and without hepatitis C. Quantitative assessment of the risk of donor liver graft failure using a donor risk index is useful to inform the process of organ acceptance.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 790
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Allison P, 2002, MISSING DATA QUANTIT, P136
[2]   Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: A decision analysis [J].
Amin, MG ;
Wolf, MP ;
TenBrook, JA ;
Freeman, RB ;
Cheng, SJ ;
Pratt, DS ;
Wong, JB .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (12) :1468-1475
[3]   Split-liver transplantation for two adult recipients: Feasibility and long-term outcomes [J].
Azoulay, D ;
Castaing, D ;
Adam, R ;
Savier, E ;
Delvart, V ;
Karam, V ;
Ming, BY ;
Dannaoui, M ;
Krissat, J ;
Bismuth, H .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2001, 233 (04) :565-574
[4]   Predictive factors for early mortality following liver transplantation [J].
Bilbao, I ;
Armadans, L ;
Lazaro, JL ;
Hidalgo, E ;
Castells, L ;
Margarit, C .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 17 (05) :401-411
[5]   MELD scoring system is useful for predicting prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and is correlated with residual liver function: a European study [J].
Botta, F ;
Giannini, E ;
Romagnoli, P ;
Fasoli, A ;
Malfatti, F ;
Testa, E ;
Risso, D ;
Colla, G ;
Testa, R .
GUT, 2003, 52 (01) :134-139
[6]  
Briceno J, 2000, Transpl Int, V13 Suppl 1, pS249, DOI 10.1007/s001470050334
[7]   The impact of donor age on liver transplantation:: Influence of donor age on early liver function and on subsequent patient and graft survival [J].
Busquets, J ;
Xiol, X ;
Figueras, J ;
Jaurrieta, E ;
Torras, J ;
Ramos, E ;
Rafecas, A ;
Fabregat, J ;
Lama, C ;
Ibañez, L ;
Llado, L ;
Ramon, JM .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 71 (12) :1765-1771
[8]   The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation [J].
Busuttil, RW ;
Tanaka, K .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (07) :651-663
[9]  
*DEP HHS, 2004, UN NETW ORG SHAR
[10]  
Detre K M, 1995, Liver Transpl Surg, V1, P311, DOI 10.1002/lt.500010507