Validation of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale and its cutoff score for detecting low resilience in Chinese cancer patients

被引:85
作者
Tian, Jun [1 ]
Hong, Jin Sheng [2 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Stat, Fuzhou 350004, Fujian Province, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiotherapy, Fuzhou 350004, Fujian Province, Peoples R China
关键词
Resilience; Scale; Reliability; Validity; Diagnosis; Cutoff score; Cancer;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-012-1699-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aim to investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale (RS-14) and to determine the cutoff score of the RS-14 for screening Chinese cancer patients with low resilience. The current study was divided into two studies. In the first study, we randomly selected 625 people and obtained their scores in the Chinese version of the RS-14 and SF-36 using cross-sectional survey. We then calculated the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the RS-14. In the second study, we selected 970 hospital cancer patients diagnosed during 2010 to 2011 and assessed for their resilience once and for anxiety, depression, and quality of life on two occasions. We determined the cutoff score of the RS-14 based on the maximum Youden Index, with the scores of anxiety and depression as gold standards. The correlation coefficients for inter-items were in the range of 0.23 to 0.68 (P < 0.001), whereas those for the item-scale were in the range of 0.62 to 0.82 (P < 0.001). Two factors represent the factor structure of the RS-14. The correlation coefficient between the RS-14 and SF-36 scores was 0.82 (P < 0.001). The split-half reliability and test-retest reliability of the RS-14 were both 0.82 (P < 0.001), and the internal consistency Cronbach's alpha was 0.93. The cutoff score of 64 was obtained for screening cancer patients with low resilience (sensitivity and specificity were 0.74 and 0.71, respectively). The Chinese version of the RS-14 has good validity and reliability, and it can measure the resilience of Chinese people. The cutoff score of 64 for the RS-14 is appropriate for detecting cancer patients with low resilience in order to decrease psychological stress and improving quality of life. Health care nurses can screen and detect cancer patients with low resilience based on the said cutoff score to timely provide psychological care and interventions for the patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1497 / 1502
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   A REVIEW OF INSTRUMENTS MEASURING RESILIENCE [J].
Ahern, Nancy R. ;
Kiehl, Ermalynn M. ;
Sole, Mary Lou ;
Byers, Jacqueline .
COMPREHENSIVE CHILD AND ADOLESCENT NURSING-BUILDING EVIDENCE FOR PRACTICE, 2006, 29 (02) :103-125
[2]   SIMPLE PROOF OF SPEARMAN-BROWN FORMULA FOR CONTINUOUS TEST LENGTHS [J].
ALLISON, PD .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1976, 41 (01) :135-136
[3]  
Bai GT, 2009, J CLIN RES, V26, P2367
[4]   The cancer patient and quality of life [J].
Bottomley, A .
ONCOLOGIST, 2002, 7 (02) :120-125
[5]   Measures and correlates of resilience [J].
Bowen, DJ ;
Morasca, AA ;
Meischke, H .
WOMEN & HEALTH, 2003, 38 (02) :65-76
[6]   14-Item Resilience Scale (RS-14): Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version [J].
Damasio, Bruno Figueiredo ;
Borsa, Juliane Callegaro ;
da Silva, Joilson Pereira .
JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2011, 19 (03) :131-145
[7]   Health related quality of life in prostate carcinoma patients - A systematic review of randomized controlled trials [J].
Efficace, F ;
Bottomley, A ;
van Andel, G .
CANCER, 2003, 97 (02) :377-388
[8]   Resource Loss, Resource Gain, and Psychological Resilience and Dysfunction Following Cancer Diagnosis: A Growth Mixture Modeling Approach [J].
Hou, Wai Kai ;
Law, Chi Ching ;
Yin, Jing ;
Fu, Yiu Tung .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 29 (05) :484-495
[9]  
Lawford J, 2001, Pediatr Rehabil, V4, P209
[10]  
Leung C M, 1993, Int J Psychosom, V40, P29